It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to the remote natural environments, such as the South Pole.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development?
In the modern world nowadays, not only scientists but also tourists are able to access far-reaching natural ecology, such as the South Pole. This development totally contains both various benefits and drawbacks.
On the one hand, it is without controversy that this prevailing development brings enormous advantages to the local area. Firstly, the appearance of scientific discoveries helps the community to gain a deeper knowledge about the remote natural environment then having effective proponents to develop as well as protect these ecologies based on their potentials. For instance, the discovery of Loyal United Kingdom scientists to Son Doong cave of Vietnam attributed to the famous of this renowned destination to not only Vietnamese but also foreign citizens. Secondly, the travel of tourists to these remote domains such as the South Pole creates a precious opportunity to the host area thrives their socio-economic up. For example, the development of the tourism industry contributed to the flourish of various minority ethnics in far-reaching areas of Vietnam. People are now having a high-income and this apparently set a fundament to the thriving of educational, medical, and social culture. Notwithstanding, this development also contains various potential risks.
Having said that, there are enormous drawbacks in terms of this trend. First of all, based on the fact that many natural environments are alarming destroyed by the pollutant that tourism brings back. For example, the South Pole ecology system is urgently threatened by the huge amount of traveling garbage. Moreover, the dramatic increase of scientists and tourists achieve to the remote natural environment can destroy its raw ecosystem, which would never rehabilitate as the former circumstance. For instance, the beauty of the Phong Nha forest is now becoming less natural than it had been at the previous time because of the disappearance of endangered animals such as gorillas.
In conclusion, the way that scientists, as well as tourists, are indicated to reach the remote natural environment creates both positive and negative sites. I strongly believe that this trend will continue to raise arguments in the years to come.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-06 | Sanaullah97 | 84 | view |
| 2021-03-17 | Nhungmeow246 | 84 | view |
| 2015-04-19 | Sanaz86 | 73 | view |
- Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries Do you agree or disagree 84
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to the remote natural environments such as the South Pole What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development 84
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to the remote natural environments such as the South Pole Do you agree or disagree with this development 78
- Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is it gives a person the opportunity to help other people Do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1878.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49122807018 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99854050656 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7884334855 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.375 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5625 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417538172628 0.244688304435 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111089524002 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510305859137 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235010881591 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748393159195 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.