Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is it gives a person the opportunity to help other people.
Do you agree or disagree?
Being rich undoubtedly brings various benefits to the individual, some people raise an argument that the most crucial thing about wealth is it gives an individual the opportunity to help the community. I personally disagree with this point of view.
On the one hand, it is without controversy that being rich creates golden chances for people to become the most dominant factor in humanity campaigns. A flourishing financial resource ensures a long-lasting and stable humanitarian process. For example, the donation of the rich class in the community attributed to the success of the government attempts to thrive up the remote areas in Vietnam with electricity, education, and medical. Notwithstanding, if the rich celebrities positively engage in various campaigns to help the community, it obviously inspires and spreads the warm-hearted activities on an enormous scale. For instance, the star soccer player Ronaldo together with his fans established a humanitarian organization that helps disabled children in the whole world.
On the other hand, it would not compulsory for only rich people can have the ability to help others. Everyone can help other people based on their individual skills and abilities. Take a renowned speaker, Nick Vujicic as a clear example, who was known to be disabled but his willingness apparently created a strong wave to encourage people to surpass difficulties in life then purchase their dreams. Moreover, some rich individuals are believed to totally pay attention to their benefits that ignore their responsibility to dedicate to the public. For example, some huge entrepreneurs ready to pollute the environment with their industrial pollutants which had a profound impact on the livings of vicinity citizens.
In conclusion, after all my personal arguments above, I just want to point out that wealth literally indicates your processes to help people. However, the most crucial key to spread kindness is eventually from your heart and enthusiasm not only based on the financial potential.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-29 | hieu13092006 | 56 | view |
| 2022-05-06 | Yoldoshali | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-31 | Nanddy | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-22 | rajpatel90 | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-24 | mirsohails | 67 | view |
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries Do you agree or disagree 84
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to the remote natural environments such as the South Pole Do you agree or disagree with this development 78
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to the remote natural environments such as the South Pole What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nly based on the financial potential.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, after all, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1717.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4335443038 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02120072513 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607594936709 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6703299805 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.642857143 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289550669618 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907263744446 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853445724165 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176338118585 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111601478423 0.056905535591 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.