Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects. What is specific to these online encyclopedias, however, is that any Internet user can contribute a new article or make an editorial change in an existing one. As a result, the encyclopedia is authored by the whole community of Internet users. The idea might sound attractive, but the communal online encyclopedias have several important problems that make them much less valuable than traditional, printed encyclopedias. First, contributors to a communal online encyclopedia often lack academic credentials, thereby making their contributions partially informed at best and downright inaccurate in many cases. Traditional encyclopedias are written by trained experts who adhere to standards of academic rigour that nonspecialists cannot really achieve. Second, even if the original entry in the online encyclopedia is correct, the communal nature of these online encyclopedias gives unscrupulous users and vandals or hackers the opportunity to fabricate, delete, and corrupt information in the encyclopedia. Once changes have been made to the original text, an unsuspecting user cannot tell the entry has been tampered with. None of this is possible with a traditional encyclopedia. Third, the communal encyclopedias focus too frequently, and in too great a depth, on trivial and popular topics, which creates a false impression of what is important and what is not. A child doing research for a school project may discover that a major historical event receives as much attention in an online encyclopedia as, say, a single long-running television program. The traditional encyclopedia provides a considered view of what topics to include or exclude and contains a sense of proportion that online "democratic" communal encyclopedias do not.
Recently, there has been a ton of debate as to what type of encyclopedia is more essential, accurate and important. More specifically, in regard to the passage, the writer puts forth the idea that traditional printed encyclopedias are important than online encyclopedias. In the listening passage, the lecturer is quick to point out there are some serious flaws in the writer’s claims. In fact, the professor believes online encyclopedias better than traditional printed encyclopedias and addresses, in detail, the trouble with each point made in the reading text.
First and foremost, the author of the reading states that online encyclopedias can be written persons which have lack academic credentials. So ,there are huge chances to errors. Some professionals in the same field, however, stand in firm opposition to this claim. In the listening, for example, the professor states the traditional encyclopedias is not perfect as there are no chance to correct the text but in case of online encyclopedias there are huge chance to correct the mistakes of writings. He goes on to say that any error in online encyclopedias is corrected by the professional writers and keeps updating for all the time.
Secondly, one group of scholars, represented by the writer, thinks that there are no security in the online encyclopedias because any one can change the text. Of course, though, not all experts in this sector believe this is accurate. Again, the speaker specifically addresses this point when he states the crucial topics of the online encyclopedias are protected . Additionally, he notes that it cannot be changed for its constant structure.
Finally, the author wraps his argument by positing that the online encyclopedias allow many unimportant topics and create complicated situations in any topic . Not surprisingly, the lecturer takes issue with this claim by contending that it is good to allow any statement in any topic because it only be possible as the huge place in online encyclopedias. For this huge place, any topic can be included in online encyclopedias.
To sum up, both the writer and professor hold conflicting views about encyclopedias. It is clear that they will have trouble, in case of finding common ground on this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-16 | TiOluwani97 | 87 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | keisham | 83 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | Dat_Nguyen | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-28 | MotherAstronaut | 85 | view |
| 2022-12-28 | MotherAstronaut | 85 | view |
- Humans have been battling the tropical disease malaria since at least the late fourth century B C This debilitating and deadly disease is actually a parasite which reproduces in humans and is spread through the saliva of mosquitoes when they suck blood fr 68
- Although Johannes Vermeer is famous for his masterpiece Girl with a Pearl Earring not much is known about who modeled for the painting The curiosity aroused by the mystery brought about several theories about the true identity of the model The first candi 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Grades marks encourage students to learn Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much money on clothing to improve their appearance Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words Do not use memorized examples 95
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to so much information creates problems Which view do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...hich have lack academic credentials. So ,there are huge chances to errors. Some p...
^^
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...ity in the online encyclopedias because any one can change the text. Of course, though...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...f the online encyclopedias are protected . Additionally, he notes that it cannot ...
^^
Line 7, column 158, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...eate complicated situations in any topic . Not surprisingly, the lecturer takes is...
^^
Line 7, column 302, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
... statement in any topic because it only be possible as the huge place in online en...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, in fact, of course, in regard to, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1903.0 1373.03311258 139% => OK
No of words: 362.0 270.72406181 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25690607735 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06885101895 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511049723757 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 605.7 419.366225166 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0716596192 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.722222222 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297509877197 0.272083759551 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09324505209 0.0996497079465 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783818072839 0.0662205650399 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156832316405 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078746763231 0.0443174109184 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...hich have lack academic credentials. So ,there are huge chances to errors. Some p...
^^
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...ity in the online encyclopedias because any one can change the text. Of course, though...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...f the online encyclopedias are protected . Additionally, he notes that it cannot ...
^^
Line 7, column 158, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...eate complicated situations in any topic . Not surprisingly, the lecturer takes is...
^^
Line 7, column 302, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
... statement in any topic because it only be possible as the huge place in online en...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, in fact, of course, in regard to, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1903.0 1373.03311258 139% => OK
No of words: 362.0 270.72406181 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25690607735 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06885101895 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511049723757 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 605.7 419.366225166 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0716596192 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.722222222 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297509877197 0.272083759551 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09324505209 0.0996497079465 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783818072839 0.0662205650399 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156832316405 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078746763231 0.0443174109184 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.