The table illustrates the amount of funds allocated by the USA, EU countries and other countries to developing regions, during a five years interval starting from 2006.
Overall, the greatest part of the donation was provided by the USA and all the nations increased their contribution during most of the interval.
In the beginning, a total amount of 15.7 million dollars was paid by the abovementioned countries, while the biggest share belonged to the US by 9.8 followed by European Union countries by 3.1 and other countries by 2.8 million dollars. All these areas maintained the same place in the upcoming years, leading to the final figures of 20.3, 4.1 and 37 respectively by 2010.
Although an inclining pattern is witnessed for all countries over the course of these years, there are two exceptions, for EU countries and other countries in 2009, resulting in a total reduction of funds, from 24.4 million dollars in 2008 to 23.5 million dollars in 2009. however, it was compensated by 2010 reaching to final aid of 28.1 million dollars.
- Some believe that modern technology is increasing the gap between rich and poor people while others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people prefer to a live in house while others feel that there are more advantages to live in apartment Are there more advantages than disadvantages of living in a house comparing with living in an apartment 78
- individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005 78
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 274, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...n 2008 to 23.5 million dollars in 2009. however, it was compensated by 2010 reaching to...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02857142857 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76789760339 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582857142857 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.7192191485 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.666666667 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1666666667 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438313541944 0.215688989381 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188179631295 0.103423049105 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148494550884 0.0843802449381 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248721969046 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143544720778 0.0819641961636 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.