memoir of Chevalier de Seingalt
The reading and the lecture are both about the accuracy and reliability of the memoir of Chevalier de Seingalt. Whereas the author of the reading states that Chevalier made up some events and altered some to make his memoir more exited, the lecturer suggest that Chevalier the memoir is indeed accurate and reliable. The lecturer cast doubt on the main points made in the reading by providing three reasons.
First of all, according to the article, the memoir said when he was living in Switzerland, he was rich, but records shows that he borrowed money from a merchant. However, the lecturer disputes this point. She says that he was wealthy and have a lot of assets. Furthermore, she mentions that he was borrowed money because it takes time to convert his assets to money.
Secondly, the reading states that critics are worried about the accuracy of conversations in the memoir, because these meetings happened years before he wrote the memoir. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this argument. She argues that at the end of each conversation he writes notes and keep record of it. In addition, she points out there are reference who confirm that and he discusses with them these notes.
Finally, the passage claims that when he was a prisoner in Italy, he bribed the jailer to get free, unlike what he wrote which is making a hole in the ceiling to escape. On the other hand, the lecturer says that there are record in old Venetian government shows that when Chevalier escape the had to repair the ceiling which indicate the accuracy of the memoir.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-10 | funmiphysio | 70 | view |
| 2021-05-12 | Shrushti Krishna Vishwasrao | 73 | view |
| 2021-03-30 | dsaqwe123 | 60 | view |
| 2021-03-30 | dsaqwe123 | 76 | view |
| 2020-11-08 | adru | 73 | view |
- online encyclopeidas 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People should keep trying to reach their goals even if they seem impossible to achieve Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position 60
- the cause of decline of literature books 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- certify wood companies 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 404, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the reading by providing three reasons First of all according to the article th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 357, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...akes time to convert his assets to money Secondly the reading states that critics...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 405, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t and he discusses with them these notes Finally the passage claims that when he ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...scusses with them these notes Finally the passage claims that when he was a p...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 278, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Chevalier) must be used with a third-person verb: 'escapes'.
Suggestion: escapes
...an government shows that when Chevalier escape the had to repair the ceiling which ind...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, whereas, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1279.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79026217228 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35598684568 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505617977528 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 404.1 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 13.0662251656 8% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 267.0 21.2450331126 1257% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.2860985944 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1279.0 110.228320801 1160% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 267.0 21.698381199 1231% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 132.0 7.06452816374 1868% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217072306229 0.272083759551 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217072306229 0.0996497079465 218% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133766493166 0.162205337803 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130988316589 0.0443174109184 296% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 134.6 13.3589403974 1008% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -191.07 53.8541721854 -355% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 5.55761589404 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 106.2 11.0289183223 963% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.98 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 20.25 8.42419426049 240% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 53.0 10.7273730684 494% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 108.8 10.498013245 1036% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 53.0 11.2008830022 473% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.