The pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
The given pie charts demonstrate us the electricity production from fuel sources in Australia and in France in 1980 and 2000. The table shows that coal was the main source for electricity production in Australia and France. Later in France, coal was replaced by nuclear power.
According to the given report, Australia produced 100 units of electricity in 1980, while France produced 90 units. In 1980, coal accounted for about half of the total electricity production units in Australia by fuel sources. The rest was oil, natural gas and hydro power. In France, by contrast, coal and natural gas accounted for half of electricity in 1980. 15 units of electricity production in France had nuclear power, while Australia had no nuclear power.
In 2000, Australia and France respectively, produced 170 units and 180 units of electricity. The demand for coal in electricity production in Australia has been exaggerated. Oil and natural gas were very minimally used for electricity production. Similarly in France in 2000, when nuclear power in electricity production increased significantly. In France was rarely used in the production of electricity from hydro power and natural gas
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-04 | Mirfayzbek | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-19 | drtruong92 | 11 | view |
| 2018-01-30 | Phan yen nhi | 73 | view |
- This table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989
- The table below show percentage of national consumer on spending expenditures five different countries in 2002
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given pie charts demonstrate us the ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce coal was replaced by nuclear power According to the given report Australia ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r while Australia had no nuclear power In 2000 Australia and France respectivel...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inimally used for electricity production Similarly in France in 2000 when nuclear...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 32.9175257732 6% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 26.3917525773 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.85567010309 207% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 937.175257732 104% => OK
No of words: 188.0 206.0 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17021276596 4.54256449028 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.78020617076 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88782273432 2.54303337028 114% => OK
Unique words: 68.0 127.690721649 53% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.36170212766 0.622605031667 58% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 307.8 290.88556701 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 1.44329896907 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 12.6804123711 8% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 188.0 16.3608247423 1149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 44.8134815571 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 972.0 76.5299724578 1270% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 188.0 16.8248392259 1117% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 24.0 4.34317383033 553% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 2.54639175258 157% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 7.41237113402 13% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.94845360825 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.517949040216 0.216113520407 240% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.517949040216 0.0766984524023 675% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0603063233224 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.410003268241 0.12726935374 322% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0861308431737 0.0580467560999 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 96.9 8.37731958763 1157% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -119.34 70.7449484536 -169% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 3.82989690722 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 76.6 7.45979381443 1027% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.89 8.71597938144 159% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 14.89 7.59969072165 196% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 41.2886597938 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 55.0 8.62886597938 637% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 77.2 8.54432989691 904% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 77.0 8.15463917526 944% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.