It is argued by some people that the budget spent on space exploration should be allocated to address urgent issues like poverty, education, or worldwide crises regardless of the enormous benefits that space research has brought to human beings. However, I disagree with this judgment.
People do not conduct space research merely for contenting curiosity, those studies are extremely precious from scientific and economic perspectives. Space exploration has broadened our horizons about the universe, the origin of our Earth, and the solar system. This valuable knowledge directly benefits in creating technology breakthroughs. Utilizations derived from accomplishments outside the Earth are not ambiguous to the general population, by contrast, these are much more familiar to us. Take meteorology, for example, weather forecast was no longer an arduous task like before with the worthwhile support from the weather satellite system. More obvious evidence of the vital role of space research is the Global positioning system (GPS) which is fundamentally based on artificial satellite systems. Pilots will be likely to confront a ton of difficulties to navigate a plane, as well as taxi drivers, tend to be troublesome to reach the destinations, without GPS.
However, pouring money into space does not mean the concern about other crucial problems is sinking into oblivion. Only a few countries have space research programs. In other words, governments of the majority of nations still concentrate the vast money and resources to cope with poorness, environmental pollution, and illiteracy. Even in predominant countries in space affairs, the money that they invest in space missions only takes up a few percentages of their national budget. Besides, inventions involving space studies also help to solve global realistic puzzles to some extent. To be specific, satellite internet has provided a working platform for outsourced jobs in developing countries, contributing to a significantly decreased unemployment rate in these countries.
In conclusion, space research is undeniably beneficial, thus should be financially encouraged to develop beside other priorities.
- The money spent on space research has brought enormous benefits to mankind but it could be more usefully applied How far do you agree 89
- The money spent on space research has brought enormous benefits to mankind but it could be more usefully applied How far do you agree 89
- Young people are much more aware of and concerned about issues like the environment poverty and animal welfare than previous generations What is your opinion 73
- The money spent on space research has brought enormous benefits to mankind but it could be more usefully applied How far do you agree 89
- Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature and history of their own country rather than the literature and history of other countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, still, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58333333333 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9750188758 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626543209877 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 324.0 20.2975951904 1596% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1809.0 106.682146367 1696% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 324.0 20.7667163134 1560% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 117.0 7.06120827912 1657% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226692092503 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.226692092503 0.084324248473 269% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141513233585 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476351979315 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 166.9 13.0946893788 1275% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -274.3 50.2224549098 -546% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 132.0 11.3001002004 1168% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 16.56 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 25.7 8.58950901804 299% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 62.0 9.78957915832 633% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 131.6 10.1190380762 1301% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 132.0 10.7795591182 1225% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, still, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58333333333 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9750188758 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626543209877 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 324.0 20.2975951904 1596% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1809.0 106.682146367 1696% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 324.0 20.7667163134 1560% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 117.0 7.06120827912 1657% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226692092503 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.226692092503 0.084324248473 269% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141513233585 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476351979315 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 166.9 13.0946893788 1275% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -274.3 50.2224549098 -546% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 132.0 11.3001002004 1168% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 16.56 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 25.7 8.58950901804 299% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 62.0 9.78957915832 633% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 131.6 10.1190380762 1301% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 132.0 10.7795591182 1225% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.