In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Todays technologies enable us to read book on electronic devices and what's more, we can store hundreds of thousands of books on devices like Amazon's Kindle e-reader. This makes some people to believe that people will stop printing books and in the future, everything will be digitalized.
Electronic books and newspapers have many advantages. They are easy to use and reach. They can be stored in computers, mobiles, e-readers and in cloud in huge amounts and are available at any time. The cost of manufacturing and printing is completely removed, which reduced their price. Digital book and newspapers also have one very important advantage - they are environmentally friendly. No paper is used to print magazines and books, which means less trees are cut from our forests to produce papers. All of these factors convinced many people that digital versions of books and magazines is more convenient, ethical and cheaper choice.
On the other hand, traditional printed books and magazines have existed for centuries and I believe they have created some kind of emotional connection and value for people. When a man reads a book and he likes it, he most probably would like to have it in a form of a tangible thing. Books are a form of art, like statues and paintings. You can have a picture of some famous painting, but the painting itself has some intangible value. Magazines and newspapers do not have such a value in themselves.
Based on this, I believe that the amount of books are printed will decrease considerably and maybe even dramatically, however printed, tangible books will still be demanded by many people as they have some aura and value in addition to the things that are written inside.
I do think, though, that there is a big chance magazines and newspapers will move into the online world completely. This is because they are published in huge numbers daily and weekly and monthly and no one needs them after years. Printing so huge amount of articles will demand additional resources and make them less competitive even in terms of price.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-11-06 | Nguyen Thinh | 56 | view |
2024-10-11 | bigbuu97 | 73 | view |
2023-12-05 | Daniel3003 | 61 | view |
2023-11-28 | huynguyen3726 | 56 | view |
2023-11-26 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 67
- Some people believe that having instant messaging apps like WhatsApp or Viber on our smartphones has improved our communication Others feel that it has only damaged the way we communicate Discuss both vies and give your own opinion 81
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 61
- People today rarely interact with their neighbors and this is having a harmful effect on local communities What are the possible causes of this trend What can be done to address it 95
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
... to read book on electronic devices and whats more, we can store hundreds of thousand...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 451, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun trees is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... print magazines and books, which means less trees are cut from our forests to produ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, so, still, in addition, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 10.4138276553 240% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95689655172 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65940862771 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557471264368 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3492544784 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277704617722 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851049966164 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565255315454 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165198735044 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415952495555 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.