Some people think that it is best to live in a vertical city (mean that people work and live in high buildings) while others think a horizontal city is better. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
While many believe in vertical cities as the best choice for urban living, others think that a city which is horizontally developed is much better. Although I agree with the latter position, this essay will analyze both views.
There are reasons why many opt for vertical cities. To begin with, they feel a sense of community when sharing a space with others. Further, a number of people now prefer living in a home where everything is laid out on a single floor plan as they see managing an apartment is less stressful than a house. Finally, many countries simply do not have space to build horizontal cities. Singapore is a prime example; in this city state, people see high-rises as an optimal option that marries the needs of both residence and green spaces.
However, I am convinced that horizontal city is better for a number of reasons. Firstly, this way of urbanization is more sustainable as it frees people from the stress of living in a concrete jungle (i. e. a vertical city). Secondly, developing a horizontal city helps minimize the level of destruction when a city is hit by man-made or natural disasters such as September 11 attacks or earthquakes. Thirdly, if megacity and skyscrapers become nothing on the contrary an obsession, it is certainly not a good trend. Environmentally speaking, this trend poses an immense pressure on the world's increasingly scarce resources when resources are consumed in massive amounts to power these glass walled buildings, let alone the greenhouse gas emissions during the building process.
In conclusion, though developing vertical cities is an inevitable trend, I would campaign for horizontal cities as a sustainable future for urban development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-25 | vuhieuquy | 56 | view |
| 2021-04-16 | nguyenthimyhoa | 67 | view |
- 6 It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South Pole Do the advantages of such developments outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Over the course of history leadership roles have been dominated by male workers It has been suggested that women are not suitable for these positions To what extend do you agree or disagree 56
- Today the quality of life in large cities is decreasing Discuss the causes and solutions 78
- Some people think that it is best to live in a vertical city mean that people work and live in high buildings while others think a horizontal city is better Discuss both view and give your opinion 67
- Over the course of history leadership roles have been dominated by male workers It has been suggested that women are not suitable for these positions To what extend do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: EG_SPACE[2]
Message: There should be no space here: 'i.e.'.
Suggestion: i.e.
...e stress of living in a concrete jungle i. e. a vertical city. Secondly, developing a...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 263, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'help'?
Suggestion: help
... Secondly, developing a horizontal city helps minimize the level of destruction when ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10357142857 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87350449125 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639285714286 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4955724472 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.071428571 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78571428571 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283359714061 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867470542335 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780390917337 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172713900939 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051383973403 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.