The graph below shows the population figures of different types of turtle in India between 1960 and 2112. Summarize the information by reporting main features and make comparison where possible.
The line graph below provides information on various kind of turtle found in India during time frame of 1960 to 2012. In graph four categories of turtles which observed in India was Olive Ridly turtle, Green turtles, Leatherback turtle and all other species.
If we summarized the whole data in 1960 variety of turtle population had same number which abruptly changed through the years, and in 2012 Oliver Ridly turtles population peaked on the other hand Green and Leatherback turtle population plunged.
The proportion of Olive Ridley turtle was 100 index in 1960, which gradually increased with each passing year and in 1996 mounted index was130. From 1996 onward the population growth rate irregularly enhanced and fall till 2012 when this index was 120. However, this particular type of turtle showed advance growth from rest of others. The second kind which shows minute rise in index was all species of turtle, although, its index rise and fall was abrupt during given time period and in 2012 its index reached to 110 from 100 in 1996.
The Green turtle population slightly increased in some initial years from 1960 but from 1962 onward started declining without any considerable uniformity and peaked around 2000 when their number was 120. But in very next years its again showed decrease in number and in 2012 reached to 90 individuals of this type. In case of leather back turtle which also showed growth rate till 1987 when its numbers was 120 but after each passing year turned disadvantageous for it as its number declined massively and in 2012 only less than 50 individual observed which number is near to extinction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-06 | Farwa Nasir | 73 | view |
- Local people don t go very often to museum or historical sites What can be done to change this situation Give reasons and example from relevant experience 84
- Some people think that it s best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue to it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Nowadays more and more people are using consumer goods such as refrigerators and washing machines Are there more advantages or disadvantages to this Give your own opinion and examples 89
- The graph below shows the injuries that occur at home Summarise the main information by reporting the main features and make comparisons where possible 50
- The restoration of older buildings in major cities throughout the world involve enormous expenditures This money would bring more benefits if it was used to provide new housing and road development To what extend do you agree or not 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below provides information on various k...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ough the years, and in 2012 Oliver Ridly turtles population peaked on the other h...
^^
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'index' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'indexes', 'indices'.
Suggestion: indexes; indices
...oportion of Olive Ridley turtle was 100 index in 1960, which gradually increased with...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 965.302439024 141% => OK
No of words: 274.0 196.424390244 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96715328467 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37396065012 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529197080292 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.8309131939 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.1 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168701972914 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852648021477 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059349014821 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128866359384 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596879896497 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.