The information on various types of food such as meat, salt and fish by the Chinese people is depicted by the given line chart. The data has been calibrated in grams.
Looking in overall, it is evident that the fish consumption was highest, on the contrary side the meat eating by far the lowest figure.
To commence with, in the beginning, fish eating, which is 600 grams by a person in 1985. While the changes in fish consumption grown minimally. However, the data of China remained constant from 700 to 600 between 1990 and 1995. A dramatic increase was observed in eating consumer of fish till 2010, a touch of the peak point in given of period.
Furthermore, the eating of salt and meat was 500 and 100, corresponding. Nonetheless, in the meat of eating in no marked difference noticed in till 1995. A minor rose was recognized in the grams of meat consumption, compared to 200 in 2010. Similarly, there had been a surprising dropped noticed in the food consumption of salt in China, accounted for 300 in the years of 2000. However, both figure data shown similar at the end of the year accounted at 200 grand per week.
- Some people believe that tourists should accept social and environmental responsibility while others believe that tourists should not accept any responsibility at all To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think that young people should spend their free time with their families instead of enjoying outside entertainment However others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people think that paying taxes is enough to contribute to the society other argue that being citizen involves more responsibilities Discuss what is your opinion 78
- The graph below shows the sales of children s books adult fiction and educational books between 2002 and 2006 in one country 93
- The bar chart below shows the number of miles travelled in a year by men and women for six different purposes in a particular country Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparisons where relevant 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...which is 600 grams by a person in 1985. While the changes in fish consumption grown m...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, nonetheless, similarly, so, while, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64179104478 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63245673651 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562189054726 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7615523789 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.75 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106500641783 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0386065803766 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403968761672 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0679090953779 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349407717906 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.