Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
A great number of people consider verbal communication to be stronger comparing to a written one. I wholeheartedly agree with this statement, and present several crucial factors regarding this point of view.
one key factor that makes verbal interaction a stronger method of communication than written correspondence is its effectiveness. speakers can use a variety of tones, paces and intensities to vividly convey their message to the audience or share their ideas with listeners. Numerous CEOs and personal development coaches, e.g., Anthony Robbins, utilize oral communications to develop a close relationship with people and motivate them directly. Another important factor involves flexibility, since, based on the situation, it can be altered into a formal or informal manner. For instance, in a scientific conference, academic presentations are given in a formal atmosphere; however, in break sessions, the academics engage in direct and rather informal conversations. As a result of these friendly interactions, potential opportunities may present themselves to both parties.
I believe that other decisive factors, including speed and facility of use, are also involved in making verbal interaction the strongest method of communication. To further elucidate, the speakers do not require papers and pens to share their ideas or making acquaintances as they could do it directly, which generally results in a mutual sense of intimacy and understanding. also, in this regard, feedbacks can be received significantly quicker, which is considerably helpful for the speakers. they can rectify their errors rather quickly and avoid undergoing the time-consuming process of writing.
To conclude, I believe that, due to its effectiveness, flexibility, speed and facility of use, spoken communication is a stronger method of communication compared to the written one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
- In many countries schools have severe problems with student behavior. What do you think are the cause of this? What solutions can you suggest? 84
- The pictures show the process of making cherry jam Describe the process 100
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Competitiveness is considered to be a positive quality among people. How does competitiveness affect individuals? Is competitiveness a positive or negative quality? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...actors regarding this point of view. one key factor that makes verbal interactio...
^^^
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Speakers
...en correspondence is its effectiveness. speakers can use a variety of tones, paces and i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 377, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...al sense of intimacy and understanding. also, in this regard, feedbacks can be recei...
^^^^
Line 5, column 496, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
... considerably helpful for the speakers. they can rectify their errors rather quickly...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, e.g., however, if, may, regarding, so, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75899280576 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37817282767 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615107913669 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1397681265 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.153846154 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15018197303 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512663591381 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705668224408 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110881090945 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662806685141 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.