Charts A and B show the share of the uk and Australia cinema Market in 2001 and cinema admission in the uk and Australia from 1976 to 2006.
The bar graph represent the data about the movies displayed in 2001 and line chadt illustrated the trend of cinema attendence in uk and Australia over the given period between 1975 and 2005.
Overall, the most striking piece of information is that US movies were most popular than other categories. fundamentally, theater gathering were increased significantly through out the period.
By looking at the graph, most of the American, Australian and UK films were screened in UK. Where 80% of them were American movies and other movies were 10 to 20%. However, movies considered in other categories were more popular in Australia than UK with around one fourth portion.
Turning to the line graph, although there was an overall upward trend in both country's cinema admission, number of entries in UK theaters remained at top. In first two decades, there were some minor fluctuations in the number of admissions in UK ranges between 100 to 120 million, they rose in the end at around 160 million. Similarly, despite some ups and downs figures doubled in the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-20 | unkownme2020@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-20 | rajpatel90 | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-25 | manuseth09 | 78 | view |
| 2021-03-15 | asmita acharya | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-12 | asmita acharya | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Fundamentally
...ere most popular than other categories. fundamentally, theater gathering were increased signi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 169, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
... gathering were increased significantly through out the period. By looking at the graph, m...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98333333333 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64422851593 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605555555556 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5161147638 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183924869347 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733098895004 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732326216003 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111325214834 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0738633626962 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.