Some people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries, shops, and on public transport. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Prohibiting mobile phone in some public location like libraries, shops or public transport nowadays is encouraged by many individuals. From my perspective, apart from some certain areas which are prone to auditory interference, there are still some locations that mobile phone is not really a concern. Thus, I partly agree with this statement
On the one hand, mobile phone may deteriorate the atmosphere of certain locations that highly valued tranquility due to its destructive nature . Specifically, many public areas are utilized because of their high level of quietness that can be helpful for intellectual activities. For instance, many students come to library because of its specific design which can ultimate the one’s concentration and productivity. As mobile phone can create a gigantic auditory inteference, they should never be used in such places
On the other hand, there are other places that mobile phones are still really essential. In detail, smart phone is not only a tool for communication but also really helpful in many other activities. For example, finding the shortest route while traveling on public transport is an ordinary activity of human that require mobile phone. Therefore, smartphone can not be totally banned in every public locations because of different level of tranquility each public places demand and also the significant impact of it in society nowadays
To conclude, although this is still a controversial topic that many individuals still advocate to completely ban the utilization of mobile phone in public areas. I endore my partial agreement that is not necessary to ban mobile phone in all public locations since while there are some places prefer quiet environment, it is an compulsory part to use mobile phone in others
- As major cities in the world are growing today so do their problems What are problems for young people who are living in the cities as the result of continued growth How problems might be solved 78
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The diagrams below show changes in Felixstone in the UK between 1967 and 2001 73
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g Dinosaur dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ranquility due to its destructive nature . Specifically, many public areas are uti...
^^
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies. For instance, many students come to library because of its specific design w...
^^
Line 3, column 518, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...they should never be used in such places On the other hand, there are other place...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 325, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... places prefer quiet environment, it is an compulsory part to use mobile phone in ...
^^
Line 7, column 373, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lsory part to use mobile phone in others
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, really, so, still, therefore, thus, while, apart from, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36785714286 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89611943072 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.3994956754 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.3 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341685761168 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141599675622 0.084324248473 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878624420214 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219914025739 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336566688178 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.