Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? One should never judge a person by external appearances.
It is clear that human is a complex creature with a lot of sophisticated characteristics. Even it is challenging for psychologists to understand human completely. However, some people judge others based on external appearances. Conversely, I believe that we should not judge a book from its cover because of the following reasons.
First and foremost, due to the intricate nature of humans, it is misleading to judge them based on their appearance. Their cloth, face, body and so forth do not explain their attitudes utterly. Although external features are clues to predict someone characteristics, the clues always are not significant. For example, we know many people who are wealthy; however, they wear simple cloths. Moreover, there are numerous people who do not have luxury life, but purchase expensive things just for showing to others and creating feel of satisfaction in themselves. Therefore, in this example if we judge them based on their cloths, our guess will be wrong. So, we should never judge people based on their external features because it is a big mistake which not only can mislead us to having a true estimation about someone, but also it can put damage to our friendships.
Secondly, judging others is a harmful behavior because those who live in glass houses should not throw stones. In other words, we do not like others judge us; thus, based on golden rule, we should stop doing this dangerous action. There are many people who are mentally affected by others’ judging. As a result, they wear a mask in order to get acceptance from the society. However, they do not feel fulfillment, and they feel sadness from inside their heart. Indeed, all of us have experienced this misfortune, being judged by our friends, coworkers, and family members. Thus, we know that how this feeling is miserable. To put it differently, to having a prosperous community, in which all members are kind to each other, it is vital to stop this unfavorable behavior.
To recapitulate, judging others based on their appearance is a harmful action that not only can affect society mental health, but also can affect our relationships because external features are not accurate information to know someone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-28 | yencmvbhp27@gmail.com | 76 | view |
| 2022-04-18 | joyce05 | 83 | view |
| 2021-06-02 | Greenbluemind | 86 | view |
| 2021-05-17 | small | 70 | view |
| 2021-05-08 | fash | 73 | view |
- Essay topics Integrated Tpo 65 Tuna Fish Farming Reading passage Wild tuna a species of large ocean fish have decreased in number because of overfishing Recently attempts have been made to farm tuna by feeding the fish in ocean cages until they become lar 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People are never satisfied with what they have they always want something more or something different Use specific reasons to support your answer 76
- Some people say that teachers and parents should decide what assignment or activities children should do after school Other says that children should make these decisions on their own Which do you agree with and why 70
- It is commonly believe that in life success is not the most important thing it is more important to remain happy and optimistic when we fail Do you agree with that idea 70
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost Use specific reasons and 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0826446281 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85600140038 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6937102771 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.25 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.15 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159115986283 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472060812295 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424637049932 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106266994291 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272469657949 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.