It is open to debate whether external appearances should be an underlying factor in judging anyone else or not. Some people suppose that the way a person looks will definitely express himself, while others reckon it is illusive. From my perspective, I can draw a conclusion that external appearances frequently create misleading information about a person.
Apparently, the way people dress can be the first place of showing their personalities, but with a small fraction. For example, people who are painstaking invariably make sure that the gown they put on is favorable for the occasion while the negligent have a tendency to spend less time beautifying themselves. Clothing and hairstyle can also tell something about social status and personal fashion, facial expression.
However, this situation only applies for a tiny minority of instances. A person with a terrible taste for fashion or a hectic schedule should not be dismissed as being remiss. To cite a more particular instance, a doctor who need to be meticulous cannot put their emphasis on choosing what to wear, how to make people drawn into them; instead, their primary role is caring for patients. Those features can also be changeable, therefore, we should not make any judgment about the inner nature and character of an individual by which his personality and identity are defined. Since character shows itself only in words and deeds, it would need a long-term observation for a right judgment. Henceforth, it is better not to take judgment of a person merely on his external appearance.
To sum up, I believe that a person should not be judged by the way he dresses.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, hence, however, if, look, so, therefore, while, for example, by the way, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 52.1666666667 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 271.0 407.700716846 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08118081181 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87348933281 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634686346863 0.524837075471 121% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4985903003 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.923076923 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 5.45110844103 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123680461849 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509967922909 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461918750273 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908962622152 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446974620637 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.