Nowadays, alarmingly global warming and global pollution are attracting more and more worldwide concerns. Consequently, some people suppose that humans should detect some paths to stay with international climate change rather than preserving it. Meanwhile others argue that as human beings, we should take responsibilities for what we have damaged as the degradation of the environment is caused by our development. In my opinion, I agree with the second viewpoint.
To begin with, the outlook that humans had better finding some effective ways to stay with climate change is a great solution for some people. One of the major reasons associated with this idea is that they do not desire to lose their money or their times helping the environment. Apparently, cleaning a beach or even a small lake can take your whole day or also make a large group of people participate. Besides, there is a remarkable cost for purifying any kind of substances in any manufacturing factories. Secondly, people assume that the climate condition in our whole world is worsening every day and might not be improved. Therefore, detecting some possible paths to settle with this severe condition is the best and most significant solution.
On the other side, other people strongly believe that humans are blamed for the degeneration of their living habitat, it is the most fundamental explanation why they should provide the environment better care. For example, a company that contributes much amount of waste to a nearby lake or river must filter and cleanse the waste before releasing it to the environment, at the same time, this organisation also have to pay more environmental tax. The most significant reason for preventing climate change is for our mental and physical wellbeing. In other words, the more clean and pure air means better lung function and better face skin.
Finally, according to these mentioned explications, I totally concur with the view that humans should preserve the climate from being change and damage by changing their mindset and habits
In conclusion, some groups of people believe that they should settle with the severe climate change rather than restraining it whilst others claim that humans should take a better responsibility towards their living atmosphere.
- Universities should accept equal number of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016 92
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured
- Some people store personal and private information online including banking contacts and addresses Is it a positive or negative trend 78
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing what do you think are the causes of problems and what measures could be tackled to solve them 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...imate change rather than preserving it. Meanwhile others argue that as human beings, we s...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, but, consequently, finally, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1917.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23770491803 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82163193848 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55737704918 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.0408366345 49.4020404114 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.8 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8 7.06120827912 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238931615091 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770257959705 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716779488341 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138022412041 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483387558971 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.