The reading passage and lecture disccus funding for concervation techniqes in forest protection to reverse negative trend that imperil our forest. The writer claims several benefits from international funding. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article. He mentions, These fundind are not convincent.
First, the author states, using these fun protect forest agriculture from logging industry. The professor refutes this statement. He suggests, the agricultur itself participate in pollution. Farmer already uses many materials which are harmful to environment more than logging. Pesticides and other material are harmful more than industries by prodects.
Second, the author urgues, these funding can develop the economies of villages and tribal communities which are located in the forest. The professor reputs this argument. He says, fun give to onwer of land. These owner are not guarantee use these fund to help residents to get education or health services because it will be not given to the state. therefor this benefit is notb realy work.
Finally, the author claims, this fiund can use to maintain valuble diversity of forest by growing many plant to prevent deforest or extiniction of animals which use these plants as food. The lecturer in the other hand says, these plant not necessary have benefit for feeding of animals. Therefore , growing of these plants may be un worth it.
The reading passage and lecture disccus funding for concervation techniqes in forest protection to reverse negative trend that imperil our forest. The writer claims several benefits from international funding. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article. He mentions, These fundind are not convincent.
First, the author states, using these fun protect forest agriculture from logging industry. The professor refutes this statement. He suggests, the agricultur itself participate in pollution. Farmer already uses many materials which are harmful to environment more than logging. Pesticides and other material are harmful more than industries by prodects.
Second, the author urgues, these funding can develop the economies of villages and tribal communities which are located in the forest. The professor reputs this argument. He says, fun give to onwer of land. These owner are not guarantee use these fund to help residents to get education or health services because it will be not given to the state. therefor this benefit is notb realy work.
Finally, the author claims, this fiund can use to maintain valuble diversity of forest by growing many plant to prevent deforest or extiniction of animals which use these plants as food. The lecturer in the other hand says, these plant not necessary have benefit for feeding of animals. Therefore , growing of these plants may be un worth it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-11 | talelaldabous | 70 | view |
- Education is a crucial thing in our life Good education makes a perfect future job Teachers are an essential part of the learning process Whether Teachers now a days are less respected by students than in the past or not This can be weighted in many aspec 63
- The reading passage and lecture are both about benefits from working 4 days a week instead of 5 days a week the author claims three benefits from working 4 days a week for companies and employees The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article He co 61
- The passing and lecturer are both about the ability of Pterosaurs of power flight The author claims Pterosaurs cannot power flight and he supports his claim by giving three evidences The lecturer casts doubt on the claim made in article She says no one of 60
- The rules have important effect on managing our societies whether these rules that young people have to obey are too strict this can be weighed in manu deffirent aspect in my perseptive I do not concur with the statement that says the rules that societies 70
- The passage and lecture are both talking about declination of cedar population in North America The author claims several reason to explain causes of this declination the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article He states these reasons are inadequed 60
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage and lecture disccus ...
^^
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cervation techniqes in forest protection to reverse negative trend that imperil o...
^^
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...al benefits from international funding. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in t...
^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are located in the forest. The professor reputs this argument. He says, fun give ...
^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefor
...ause it will be not given to the state. therefor this benefit is notb realy work. Fina...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 51, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the author claims, this fiund can use to maintain valuble diversity of forest by ...
^^
Line 4, column 101, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun plant seems to be countable; consider using: 'many plants'.
Suggestion: many plants
... valuble diversity of forest by growing many plant to prevent deforest or extiniction of a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 298, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...enefit for feeding of animals. Therefore , growing of these plants may be un worth...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, may, second, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1184.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 221.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35746606335 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5934525765 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642533936652 0.540411800872 119% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4510539107 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.6470588235 110.228320801 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.0 21.698381199 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.47058823529 7.06452816374 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33993446298 0.272083759551 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103778373208 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.17742516585 0.0662205650399 268% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257775340062 0.162205337803 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.329527941952 0.0443174109184 744% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.92 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.7273730684 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage and lecture disccus ...
^^
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cervation techniqes in forest protection to reverse negative trend that imperil o...
^^
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...al benefits from international funding. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in t...
^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are located in the forest. The professor reputs this argument. He says, fun give ...
^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefor
...ause it will be not given to the state. therefor this benefit is notb realy work. Fina...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 51, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the author claims, this fiund can use to maintain valuble diversity of forest by ...
^^
Line 4, column 101, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun plant seems to be countable; consider using: 'many plants'.
Suggestion: many plants
... valuble diversity of forest by growing many plant to prevent deforest or extiniction of a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 298, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...enefit for feeding of animals. Therefore , growing of these plants may be un worth...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, may, second, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1184.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 221.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35746606335 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5934525765 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642533936652 0.540411800872 119% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4510539107 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.6470588235 110.228320801 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.0 21.698381199 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.47058823529 7.06452816374 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33993446298 0.272083759551 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103778373208 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.17742516585 0.0662205650399 268% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257775340062 0.162205337803 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.329527941952 0.0443174109184 744% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.92 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.7273730684 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.