The reading passage and lecture disccus funding for concervation techniqes in forest protection to reverse negative trend that imperil our forest. The writer claims several benefits from international funding. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article. He mentions, These fundind are not convincent.
First, the author states, using these fun protect forest agriculture from logging industry. The professor refutes this statement. He suggests, the agricultur itself participate in pollution. Farmer already uses many materials which are harmful to environment more than logging. Pesticides and other material are harmful more than industries by prodects.
Second, the author urgues, these funding can develop the economies of villages and tribal communities which are located in the forest. The professor reputs this argument. He says, fun give to onwer of land. These owner are not guarantee use these fund to help residents to get education or health services because it will be not given to the state. therefor this benefit is notb realy work.
Finally, the author claims, this fiund can use to maintain valuble diversity of forest by growing many plant to prevent deforest or extiniction of animals which use these plants as food. The lecturer in the other hand says, these plant not necessary have benefit for feeding of animals. Therefore , growing of these plants may be un worth it.
The reading passage and lecture disccus funding for concervation techniqes in forest protection to reverse negative trend that imperil our forest. The writer claims several benefits from international funding. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article. He mentions, These fundind are not convincent.
First, the author states, using these fun protect forest agriculture from logging industry. The professor refutes this statement. He suggests, the agricultur itself participate in pollution. Farmer already uses many materials which are harmful to environment more than logging. Pesticides and other material are harmful more than industries by prodects.
Second, the author urgues, these funding can develop the economies of villages and tribal communities which are located in the forest. The professor reputs this argument. He says, fun give to onwer of land. These owner are not guarantee use these fund to help residents to get education or health services because it will be not given to the state. therefor this benefit is notb realy work.
Finally, the author claims, this fiund can use to maintain valuble diversity of forest by growing many plant to prevent deforest or extiniction of animals which use these plants as food. The lecturer in the other hand says, these plant not necessary have benefit for feeding of animals. Therefore , growing of these plants may be un worth it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-11 | talelaldabous | 70 | view |
- Spending time with our kids is a paramount factor thal help to build their personalty Whether use that time by have fun playing games or best touse itdoing things togather like doing schoolwork This cab be weighted in many aspects however some parents bel 60
- The reading passage and the lecture are both about the accuracy of Chevalier de seingalt memoreis The critics in the reading passage claim that Chevalier distorted many events in the memoir therefore the author gives three reason to explain hes view Howev 75
- Every one in this live dreem to have a good career to improve his livestyle and to be possible to manage his family demand correctly Some people believe seccess job due to the communication with well people other related the succesful job to the hard stud 70
- The reading passage and lecture about bees which are a type of the insect the author doubts the theory that is supported by discovery of old fossil that resemble bee nests the structure have been found inside 200 million years old in the state of Arizona 76
- The reading passage and the lecture are both talking about computerize smart cars The writer claims several benefits by using this type of cars However the professor casts doubt on claim made in article She believes using computerize cars is not clear ben 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage and lecture disccus ...
^^
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cervation techniqes in forest protection to reverse negative trend that imperil o...
^^
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...al benefits from international funding. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in t...
^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are located in the forest. The professor reputs this argument. He says, fun give ...
^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefor
...ause it will be not given to the state. therefor this benefit is notb realy work. Fina...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 51, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the author claims, this fiund can use to maintain valuble diversity of forest by ...
^^
Line 4, column 101, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun plant seems to be countable; consider using: 'many plants'.
Suggestion: many plants
... valuble diversity of forest by growing many plant to prevent deforest or extiniction of a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 298, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...enefit for feeding of animals. Therefore , growing of these plants may be un worth...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, may, second, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1184.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 221.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35746606335 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5934525765 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642533936652 0.540411800872 119% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4510539107 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.6470588235 110.228320801 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.0 21.698381199 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.47058823529 7.06452816374 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33993446298 0.272083759551 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103778373208 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.17742516585 0.0662205650399 268% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257775340062 0.162205337803 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.329527941952 0.0443174109184 744% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.92 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.7273730684 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage and lecture disccus ...
^^
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cervation techniqes in forest protection to reverse negative trend that imperil o...
^^
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...al benefits from international funding. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in t...
^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are located in the forest. The professor reputs this argument. He says, fun give ...
^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefor
...ause it will be not given to the state. therefor this benefit is notb realy work. Fina...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 51, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the author claims, this fiund can use to maintain valuble diversity of forest by ...
^^
Line 4, column 101, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun plant seems to be countable; consider using: 'many plants'.
Suggestion: many plants
... valuble diversity of forest by growing many plant to prevent deforest or extiniction of a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 298, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...enefit for feeding of animals. Therefore , growing of these plants may be un worth...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, may, second, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1184.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 221.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35746606335 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5934525765 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642533936652 0.540411800872 119% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4510539107 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.6470588235 110.228320801 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.0 21.698381199 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.47058823529 7.06452816374 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33993446298 0.272083759551 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103778373208 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.17742516585 0.0662205650399 268% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257775340062 0.162205337803 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.329527941952 0.0443174109184 744% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.92 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.7273730684 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.