The bar chart gives information about trips made by individuals of both sexes in a country from Europe in 2007. The chart not only visualizes the number of trips made by men and women and gives insight into their plans prior to their trips.
As can be pointed out in the chart, the number of day trips made by men exceeded the ones made by women (around 40 compared to 30). This is followed by the fact that the number of trips made by men for entertainment purposes is equally superior (140 against 130). However, several activities such as visiting friends and shopping were especially prioritized by women. To be more specific, more than 200 trips to see friends were made by women, whereas those made by men fell behind at just below 200. Similarly, up to 280 shopping trips were made by women, while only 190 trips were made by men. Finally, the number of business trips made by men was astoundingly high, as the chart recorded as high as 330 trips. This heavily surpassed the ones made by women, which only reached just over 200 trips.
A glance at the chart reveals that the number of trips made by men, especially for entertainment and business, are far more superior to the ones made by women. Meanwhile, activities such as interacting with friends and shopping received way less attention from men.
- Some say that news has no connection with most people s lives and it is a waste of time for most of us to read newspapers and watch television news programs Do you agree or disagree 67
- Task 2 Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many countries What should be done to increase cycling 78
- The chart below shows the number and the purpose of trips made by men and women in a certain European country in 2007 67
- We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Summarize the changes in the layout of the Woodward University in not less than 150 words 91
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, similarly, whereas, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66810344828 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43966659556 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.6855444719 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.4545454545 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0909090909 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.44845728994 0.215688989381 208% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187685576982 0.103423049105 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852707117198 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313800676071 0.15604864568 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573880096754 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.