The government's investment in arts,
music, and theatre is a waste of money.
Governments should invest these funds
in public services instead.
To what extent do you agree with this
statement?
To commence with the disfavor of notion, there are a plethora of factors behind the rubric. Firstly, convention and culture are combined with arts, music, and theatre from the ancient era. Owing to this, it has a massive influence on society as well as on the nation.
For instance, 'The International Art' exhibition is organized in Japan each year for all the Asian countries, they participate to light their heritage and custom nationwide. Such competitions Pride us on our cultural propensity. In addition, artists have unusual expertise in singing, dancing, and crafting, which are very precise to merely a few people overseas. To exemplify, research of London University stated that only a quarter of individuals in the world possesses the ability of crafting, theatre and musicians. Due to the above standpoint, it becomes necessary to invest in it.
Moving further, in the contemporary era, it is not only the passion, but also the occupation for artists, singers, and actresses. In other words, they entirely rely on this, for their livelihood. To epitome, a survey conducted by the cultural department of India manifested that 35% of the population depend on this, as their annual income source. Hence, it plays a vital role in people's employment in this profession.
To conclude, it has examined, although some views suggest the funding would release for art music and theatre is trivial, it endows pride of the nation and occupation for someone. Because of this, the notion is completely disagreed to spend all the budget on the social service sector, despite arts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-21 | Ravina Nagar | 84 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the proportion of English men and women of different ages who were leaving alone in 2011 The pie chart compares the number of bedrooms in one person households 78
- The bar chart below shows the proportion of English men and women of different ages who were leaving alone in 2011 The pie chart compares the number of bedrooms in one person households 84
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 84
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree of disagree 89
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, so, well, for instance, in addition, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15953307393 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81965081895 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.630350194553 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0132507209 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7142857143 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12723575917 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387392718417 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307940364137 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0761301359822 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299517807374 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.55 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.