The graph shows seasonal water consumption in four towns

Essay topics:

The graph shows seasonal water consumption in four towns

The presented line graph illustrates the amount of water, which is consumed in four towns in 4 seasons.
As can be seen that town C had the highest amount of water usage among four towns whilst town D consumed the lowest amount of water.
The amount of water usage in town C was the highest over four towns. The data of town C made up at 70 in summer , however, in the next season it dramatically decreased to a bottom at just above 10 as same as town D. Moreover, the figure of town C increased to approximately 45 in winter and remained virtually stable until spring. In total, town C used the highest amount of water utilization, at nearly 180.
On the other end of scale, town D had the lowest amount of water consumption over the whole period. In summer, town C utilized the figure of 25, which was nearly three times lower than town C. Furthermore, the figure started to decrease slightly to nearly 10 in autumn. Moreover, the statistic of town D continued to reach the bottom at eight in winter, however, it increased to approximately 13 in the next term of year. In total, town C figure was far lower in comparision with other three towns.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-09 trinhthanh1 78 view
2024-11-07 hahoaan 73 view
2024-11-03 Giang Tran 84 view
2024-11-02 Giang Tran 67 view
2024-11-02 Giang Tran 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e data of town C made up at 70 in summer , however, in the next season it dramatic...
^^
Line 4, column 499, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in comparision with other three towns.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, moreover, so, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45971563981 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57612387209 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492890995261 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9787404533 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5454545455 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349880953931 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142884651438 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952777762154 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249263364317 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515682411089 0.0819641961636 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e data of town C made up at 70 in summer , however, in the next season it dramatic...
^^
Line 4, column 499, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in comparision with other three towns.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, moreover, so, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45971563981 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57612387209 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492890995261 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9787404533 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5454545455 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349880953931 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142884651438 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952777762154 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249263364317 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515682411089 0.0819641961636 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.