The information about the populations of different age groups in Yemen and Italy in 2010 and prediction for 2050 is depicted by the rendered pie charts. The data has been calibrated in percentage.
To begin with, the public of above 60 years old persons in Yemen in 2000 was only 3.6%. However, 46.3% and 50.1% of the population of 15-59 and 0-14 age groups individuals in Yemen in the same year. Moreover, there will be a slight increase noticed in the projection for 2050 of 15-59 and 60+ age group people, which will be accounted for 57.3% and 5.7%. Furthermore, the population of 0-14 age group people will be decreased by 13.1% in 2050.
Moving towards, in Italy, the most number of individuals in 2000 and prediction for 2050 of 15 to 59 years old persons, which is accounted for 61.6% and 46.2% respectively. Although the public of the 60+ age group people was 24.1% in 2000, it will be increased dramatically, which will be comprised to 42.3%. In addition, there were fewer people who were 0-14 years old, it was only 14.3%. A drastic decrease will be seen in the percentage of the population of this age group, which will be 11.5%.
To sum up, it can be vividly manifested that half of the population in Yemen in 2000 was 0-14 years people. However, the highest population for this age group in the same year in Italy.
- Every year several languages die out Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- The flowchart illustrates the production of coloured plastic paper clips in a small factory Write a report for a university tutor describing the production process
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 56
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, in addition, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1099.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61764705882 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58179174458 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474789915966 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2432943989 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5833333333 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282561981067 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121797001918 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863372284362 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217032754766 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628062706518 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.