Some people believe that elderly employees are more useful to a company, while others believe that young employees are better. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
Employees are the backbone of the organization. In this essay, there are predominantly two contrasting views where a section of society vehemently deems that older workers are fruitful to companies while others emphasize that young staff members are better than elder staff. The following will discuss both views in detail and conclude the opinion.
On the one side, several factors make a section of people advocate that employees with years of experience are useful to their organizations and have many reasons to substantiate it. First and foremost is the known fact that experience gives real-world industry knowledge. With more knowledge, there are more responsibilities that need to be taken care of by an employee who should have enough experience to handle the daily tasks that cannot be done by newly fresh graduate trainees or interns. Secondly, experience or elder employees knowns to tackle the problems which are faced by their clients. These older workers know how to represent in front of the client who is taking the services of their firm. Thirdly, older employees have long-term stability with their companies, as a result, companies do not lose them easily. Last but not the least, many employers have consultants in their organizations who have depth root level knowledge about projects. So, the higher management is dependent on consultants to handle the projects because their knowledge is more fruitful rather than a knowledge of a rookie employee.
On the flip side, some believe that young staff members are better than older employees for certain reasons. Chiefly, these employees have many qualities to handle the manpower in the firm. Such qualities are flexibility, hard-working, quick-learning capability, dedication, and many more. With these kinds of qualities, the company has many benefits to handle the workload of small activities which can be done by young employees. Apart from this, these employees are hired in reasonable packages which a company able to bear the cost of staff members.
To conclude, in my profound opinion, to run an organization, we need both experienced and young employees because it maintains the company's stability in terms of growth, manpower, and most importantly financial security. Hence, it is significantly important to keep all kinds of workers in an organization according to their level of knowledge and experience as they all are useful and backbone of a firm.
- Write a letter to your friend who is moving to a new house In your letter you should say why you are free how you can help ask questions about the new house 73
- You recently visited a theatre and had an accident there The staff were very helpful Write a letter to the manager giving good feedback In your letter you should tell and describe the accident how the staff helped you how similar situations could be preve 87
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Modern communications mean that it s no longer necessary to write letters To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your o 84
- A friend has agreed to stay in your apartment and look after it while you are away Write a letter to your friend In your letter give information about your flat provide any important instructions say what he she should do if there are any problems 73
- An increasing number of developing countries are expanding their tourist industry Why do you think it is the case Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a rookie employee. On the flip side, some believe that young staff members ar...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, apart from, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2058.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31782945736 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9122834136 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529715762274 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 628.2 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4583314947 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.333333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298032690129 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867403536373 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642328827956 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178284059636 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646791911143 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.