Some people think that it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools. Others, however, believe that boys and girls benefit more from attending mixed schools. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
It is argued by some people that it is more beneficial to send students to single-gender schools. However, I believe that boys and girls gain more advantages from studying at co-ed schools.
On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why some suppose that it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools. Firstly, schools can have a more suitable curriculum as they design distinctive subjects and skills according to each gender’s strong suit and interest. For instance, it is estimated that boys mostly show a great passion for science subjects including physics, mathematics and chemistry as well as playing various kinds of sports. Secondly, single-sex schools will create a more convenient environment for each gender to express themselves freely. To illustrate, I remember an unusual lesson when I was at secondary school. My young biology teacher was so uncomfortable to deliver a lecture on the human body that in the end, she determined to divide my class into two groups of genders.
On the other hand, I would argue that students benefit more from entering mixed schools. First, boys and girls can make friends with each other easily. As a result, they can learn a number of worthwhile things from their opposite-sex friends. For example, boys are often considered creative while girls tend to be more careful. Another reason is that co-educational schools help to raise the awareness of gender equality. When boys and girls study at the same schools, they are given the chance to participate in the same competitions and extracurricular activities; therefore, there will be more opportunities for girls to prove themselves.
In conclusion, although there are some benefits to sending students to single-gender schools, I personally believe that they should be taught at mixed-sex ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-04 | kokomongcutee | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-05 | idid382021 | 84 | view |
| 2022-04-04 | idid382021 | 84 | view |
| 2022-03-30 | idid382021 | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | mhuong_d | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21088435374 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91265317562 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578231292517 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5449193362 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.133333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307191673226 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105873135283 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661147685916 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18594971085 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668372213463 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.