TPO 38: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Humans possess a wide range of characteristics that help them to distinguish themselves from other people. There are some intrinsic features and extrinsic features. Categorizing some of the features in one of these categories is controversial such as being a leader. While some people are inclined towards the idea that leadership comes naturally to people, others are against this claim. As far as I am concerned, I am of the opinion that leadership is an acquired feature and everyone can possess this. In the following paragraph, I will delve into some reasons justifying my point of view.
The first noteworthy reason coming to my mind is that people access to various sources of knowledge and educational programs that provide them with golden opportunities to broaden their scope of knowledge and be skillful in every area, leadership is no exception. There are countless TV programs, private courses, reliable books that tutor people to lead a group. If this feature is innate it should not be reachable through these valuable sources. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When I was a teenager, I was painfully shy with an introverted personality, however, during college as we forced to participate in mandatory extra classes, I could learn how to be a good leader in one of these courses.
Another exquisite point to be mentioned is that there is no compelling evidence to prove leadership is an intrinsic feature. Although some findings might show the effect of inheritance on being a leader, none of them is convincing. Scientists have not so far found a gene or protein in human cells that influence these features. Moreover, If this characteristic is innate it should be transferred from father or mother to all of their children, however, all of us know someone who is famous for being great leadership among relatives or colleagues, while his/her children are shy and introverted or vice versa. For instance, children of many presidents and monarchies are submissive in contrast to their parents.
To summarize, from what has been discussed above, I firmly support the idea that leadership is not an innate feature, it can be acquired through practice and education. In addition, if this feature is intrinsic it should be passed from generation to generation, while we can find leadership people with shy and introverted children.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Should people do things that they do not like 76
- Means of transportation 70
- TPO 4 _ Independent TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree？ It is better to relax by watching a movie or reading a book than doing physical exercise. Explain your answer with examples and specific reasons. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...es and extrinsic features. Categorizing some of the features in one of these categories is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 364, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ooks that tutor people to lead a group. If this feature is innate it should not be...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, in addition, in contrast, such as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 15.1003584229 219% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1977.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10852713178 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98690127591 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542635658915 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1374162706 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.833333333 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170301728933 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502785312729 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380069420711 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105750061827 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230751145585 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.