The maps depict the modernization of Felixstone over the course of 34 years: from 1967 to 2001.
Overall, the town has witnessed significant changes, the most prominent of which is the hotel complex in replacement of the farmland to the North East of Felixstone, as well as the development seen in the area in close vicinity of the sea. However, the golf course and the café stayed unchanged throughout the time period.
On High Street which aligns itself with the golf course and the swimming pool, to the right, a range of shops has been demolished to make way for a range of apartments built along the street. Adjacent to it is the new hotel complex with state-of-the-art facilities, including a swimming pool and two new tennis courts.
To the South West of the town, a number of dunes have been flattened and wind turbines have been constructed in the aforementioned area. Furthermore, the marina, the pier and the fish market to the South East of Felixstone have been knocked down to provide space for the public and private beaches. Last but not least, next to the former beach is the refurbished hotel and a newly-built car park.
- The pie charts and table gives information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000 79
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 90
- Maps show the changes of the lakeside 2000 2009 95
- The 2 maps below show the changes that have taken place in Felixstone from 1967 to 2001 Summarise the best relevant points and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The diagram below shows the stages in the recycling of aluminium drinks cans Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80808080808 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77647352301 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580808080808 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2120503465 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0908185779135 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415109999854 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643822153618 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0698356253724 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079266736876 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.