Many animals are endangered. Some people argue that we should only protect animals that are useful to humans. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In many parts of the world, endangered animals are inclined to become extinct. Many hold a belief that individuals and governments should only preserve species that are economically beneficial to humans. However, to the best of my knowledge, all animals that are being threatened should be protected for the following reasons.
Firstly, it is note-worthy that the interdependence of species is the main characteristic of eco-balance. Nowadays, many zoological studies have shown that although it is invisible, the extinction of endangered animals is closely intertwined in one way or another. Therefore, it will be a grave mistake to overlook the fact that the underpopulation of one species is accompanied by demise of other species. For example, poisonous snakes are regarded as dangerous animals; however, the extinction of snakes can result in the overpopulation of rats, which negatively affects agriculture yields. This example is the illustration of the fact that all animals should be preserved.
Secondly, the counter-argument raised by objectors to this is that we should only protect useful animals, because governments and individuals that are on the tight budget have to spend money on various social aspects, typically education and medication. This argument could be true to some extent; however, it is incomplete. What they fail to take into account is the fact that despite high expenses of animals preservation, deterring the extinction of endangered species is widely regarded as the top priority of governments. Furthermore, we are not able to predict the future and some species that are classified as useful for humans.
According to the above analysis, we can conclude that all animals in danger of extinction should be protected.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-09 | maiphuong0610 | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | maiphuong0610 | 56 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | maiphuong0610 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | maiphuong0610 | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | maiphuong0610 | 67 | view |
- the chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 89
- The charts below show the percentages of the water used in different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 89
- In many countries traditional foods are being replaced by international fast foods This is having a negative effect on both families and societies To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- The chart below gives information about the high speed continuous Internet connection of households in five countries in 2001 and 2002 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many holds'.
Suggestion: Many holds
...animals are inclined to become extinct. Many hold a belief that individuals and governmen...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44322344322 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21296999882 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534798534799 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2135568221 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.307692308 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268656581912 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945104884191 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566522084169 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172924793961 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569692615215 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.