The two bar charts give information on the destinations of graduates and postgraduates excluding full-time work in the UK in the year 2008.
Overall, most students in Britain chose to continue their studies while voluntary work was the least popular choice. Plus, it is clear that the number of graduates was higher than that of postgraduates.
In 2008, nearly 30000 graduates pursued further studies. The number of people with part-time jobs was roughly half of that, at about 18000, compared to slightly over 16000 students who were unemployed after graduation. Meanwhile, the figure for voluntary work was considerably lower, at 3500 people.
Looking at the second graph, it seems that the figures for postgraduates follow a similar pattern. To be more specific, the most popular choice was also further study, at 2725 postgraduates, followed by part-time work with about 2530 people. The figure for unemployment was lower, at approximately 1600 students. Voluntary work remained the least chosen choice as only 345 postgraduates were volunteers at that time.
- The charts below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 78
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 78
- Living in a country where you have to speak in a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country Others say that these are no the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language Discuss both views and give your own opini 89
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.48453608247 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 5.05154639175 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 32.9175257732 24% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 26.3917525773 99% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 937.175257732 96% => OK
No of words: 167.0 206.0 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38323353293 4.54256449028 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.78020617076 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93018187029 2.54303337028 115% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 127.690721649 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634730538922 0.622605031667 102% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 290.88556701 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 16.3608247423 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3820938174 44.8134815571 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9 76.5299724578 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 16.8248392259 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 4.34317383033 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155835352153 0.216113520407 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680665430282 0.0766984524023 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708737760427 0.0603063233224 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12244373457 0.12726935374 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0853982505844 0.0580467560999 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 8.37731958763 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 70.7449484536 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 7.45979381443 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 8.71597938144 156% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 7.59969072165 109% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 41.2886597938 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 8.62886597938 99% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 8.54432989691 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.