The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar graphs illustrate the activity of the students of UK after graduation and post-graduation who did not opt full-time work after completing their education in 2008.

Overall, students opting for higher studies is maximum for graduates and post-graduates while students doing voluntary work is minimum for both categories.

For graduates, the number of students opting further studies is maximum, exactly 29,665. The student selecting higher studies is almost double of the students opting for part-time work and who is confronted by unemployment. The number of students doing part-time work and unemployed is approximately similar, which is 17,735 and 16,235 respectively. The students opted for voluntary work is minimum, which is 3500. For postgraduates, the number of students doing the further study is 2,725 which is somewhat double of the number of unemployed students (1,625). The number of students doing part-time work is 2,535, which is second highest and students doing voluntary work is lowest i.e. 345.

Votes
Average: 7.4 (56 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-07-13 Bui Huyen 73 view
2020-07-07 tomleung1996 82 view
2018-10-06 izass 78 view
2019-12-24 rm21co 67 view
2019-11-05 Muhammad Ashraf 56 view
Essays by user SHARJEEL :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hich is 17,735 and 16,235 respectively. The students opted for voluntary work is mi...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.48453608247 187% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 32.9175257732 6% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 26.3917525773 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 937.175257732 93% => OK
No of words: 157.0 206.0 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54777070064 4.54256449028 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.78020617076 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95745866017 2.54303337028 116% => OK
Unique words: 73.0 127.690721649 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464968152866 0.622605031667 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 241.2 290.88556701 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 0.824742268041 849% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 1.44329896907 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4874975952 44.8134815571 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.875 76.5299724578 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 16.8248392259 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 4.34317383033 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197789879873 0.216113520407 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110543565827 0.0766984524023 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854086867023 0.0603063233224 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176588170568 0.12726935374 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0986059028702 0.0580467560999 170% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 8.37731958763 173% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 70.7449484536 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 8.71597938144 171% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 7.59969072165 108% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 41.2886597938 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 8.62886597938 139% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 8.15463917526 184% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.