Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?
Many governments impose some sorts of law in order to preserve dated constructions which plays a crucial role with respect to a country’s history. However, many individuals suppose they should be demolished to make way for new ones. From my perspective, I belive it is essential to restore heritages and progress can not be stopped by history
Maintaining old buildings is of great importance for every nation because of these core reasons. Firstly, since these buildings were built a long time ago so they can be considered as concrete evidences for every ups and downs of a nations. Therefore, they are tremendously valuable in terms of culture, inspiration and beliefs. Secondly, due to their unique designs, they can attract a host of tourists, which can increases local people’s income and contribute many positive effects to a nation’s economy
Although many people considered these buildings as obsolete and even hinder the progress of their countries, in fact there are no sorts of heritages can do that. Restoring old buildings can also includes modernization, by technical method many experts can not only keep the original characters of a construction but also make them more captivating. Also, the prominent purpose of these places is education which can provide people with historical knowledges in the most actual way and boost their patriotism as well as broaden their horizon in order to create a better world in the future
To conclude, old buildings which are indispensable parts of every nation are suggested to be knocked down and replaced by morden buildings. Nevertheless, I suppose that these constructions possess not only spiritual but also economical assets, and in no circumstances can these locations stand in the way of a progress
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-11 | Lư Kim Ngân | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | Lư Kim Ngân | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-08 | Lư Kim Ngân | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-08 | honganhb2409759 | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Lư Kim Ngân | 56 | view |
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024 90
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 82
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The diagram shows the design of a modern landfill for household waste Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 231, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a nation' or simply 'nations'?
Suggestion: a nation; nations
...te evidences for every ups and downs of a nations. Therefore, they are tremendously valua...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 416, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'increase'
Suggestion: increase
...n attract a host of tourists, which can increases local people’s income and contribute ma...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cations stand in the way of a progress
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, i suppose, in fact, as well as, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24295774648 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00746896402 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588028169014 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.3650379617 49.4020404114 197% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.444444444 106.682146367 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5555555556 20.7667163134 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.1111111111 7.06120827912 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298513030675 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114182880656 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608918347817 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179431338204 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414450574117 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.