The charts compare the proportion of energy produced by different sources in France in 1995 and 2005.
The pie chart illustrates the percentage of five types of energy generation in France from 1995 to 2005
Overall, coal and gas accounted for most of the energy production in both 2 years. While all sources were seen with increases in their usage, the petro-generated energy declined significantly in the examined period
In 1995, coal constituted the largest fraction of the whole chart with 29.80%, followed by gas with 29.63%. Ten years later, energy generated by both coal and gas rose steadily by around 1%, from 29.80% to 30.93% for coal and 29.63% to 30.31% for gas, collectively made up more than a half of the energy production
With regard to the three remaining fuels, more energy is generated by nuclear and other sources over a 10-year period. In 1995, 6.40% of energy generation was allocated to nuclear, while the figure for other fuels was roughly half of that (4.90%). Within ten years, significant growths were seen in the consumption of these sources, with increases of 4 to 4.5%. However, petro was the only fuel was seen with nearly a 10% decrease in their usage for energy production, while its figure dropped from 29.27% to 19.55%
- The charts compare the proportion of energy produced by different sources in France in 1995 and 2005 11
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone call in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that in the modern world we are more dependent on each other while others think that people have become more independent Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Village of Chorleywood showing development between 1868 and 1994 Chorleywood is a village near London whose population has increased steadily since the middle of the nineteenth century The map shows the development of the village 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89795918367 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5892241372 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566326530612 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.4788329309 43.030603864 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.0 112.824112599 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.6666666667 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170035310445 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937659384452 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784793124373 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140310118272 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0918433570476 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.