The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The pictures illustrate how a waterfront area of Darwin town had developed over a 5-year period
Overall, the whole landscape was altered with many constructions erected, though, there were still some figures that still be kept unchanged throughout the examined period
Remarkably, a vast majority of the site had been occupied by industrial area which was converted into a larger green space filled with a host of trees. A part of this industrial area located right next to the lake was also knocked down to make way for a new swimming pool. Moreover, there added 3 more houses which were adjacent to the old ones and to the west of it was a new construction of a university building.
Apart from those renovations, the lake, school, convention center, fishing area and two former swimming pools remained intact. In terms of access, travelers could visit this area from a newly-built harbour on the southeast of the map, along with a new footpath from the west connected the harbour to the main road. In contrast, the footpath encircling the center of the town was unchanged
- The charts compare the proportion of energy produced by different sources in France in 1995 and 2005 78
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The bar chart below shows the number of visitors to four London museums Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone call in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The picture below shows the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, so, still, apart from, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91803278689 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68122871622 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633879781421 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 113.665322573 43.030603864 264% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 150.0 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0888834034132 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0400632628769 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0223260108009 0.0843802449381 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0592398210816 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477840243181 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, so, still, apart from, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91803278689 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68122871622 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633879781421 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 113.665322573 43.030603864 264% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 150.0 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0888834034132 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0400632628769 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0223260108009 0.0843802449381 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0592398210816 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477840243181 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.