In many countries, the quality of life in large cities is becoming worse. What are the causes for this problem? What measures do you think should be taken to tackle the problem?
Nowadays, there has been a serious deterioration in the living standards of city dwellers in metropolitan areas in various nations. This essay aims to discuss several of the principal reasons causing this phenomenon and suggest some practical solutions to address the issues.
The degradation of living conditions in particular urban areas is attributable to a host of reasons. First and foremost, today's environment in large cities is highly contaminated by toxic chemical pollutants released from many factories, which is to blame for deleterious health effects on residents. It is exemplified by an ever-increasing number of patients who suffer from cancer and other pollution-related diseases like asthma in metropolitan cities. Another compelling cause is that the living costs in these areas have been on the rise due to population density, which puts heavy pressure on the financial budget and has negative effects on people’s quality of life. For example, in Hanoi, the expenditure spent by each individual is much more significant than that of other smaller cities, thereby, a lot of citizens can not afford their own houses.
Administrative authorities can take into consideration some possible methods to deal with this negative development. Applying higher taxes charged on manufactured whose production waste harms the environment or imposing severe fines on enterprises dumping toxic waste illegally can be effective approaches. The factories, therefore, are more likely to factor in improving their waste disposal process and not violating the law, ensuring a better environment for citizens. Furthermore, the government should introduce and enforce preferential policies to encourage people to move to other less densely populated areas, reducing the increasing demand for goods and services in large cities. The costs of living in those regions, as a result, would decrease, paving the way for better living standards.
To sum up, environmental degradation and high living costs are responsible for the low quality of life in metropolitan areas, but proper policies and strict laws are highly recommended to solve the above issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-20 | Trangdodo | 89 | view |
| 2021-01-17 | nam.phanthanh97 | 61 | view |
- The graph below presents the employment patterns in the USA between 1930 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 84
- The charts show the spending of a school in 1981 1991 and 2001 5 lines 3 n m 56
- The maps below show changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2005 and present day 67
- In many countries the quality of life in large cities is becoming worse What are the causes for this problem What measures do you think should be taken to tackle the problem 89
- Whoever controls the media also controls opinions and attitudes of people and there is little can be done to rectify this To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 174, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommended solving'.
Suggestion: recommended solving
...per policies and strict laws are highly recommended to solve the above issues.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...recommended to solve the above issues.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, for example, in particular, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1831.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5993883792 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11463048248 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62996941896 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.2819941569 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.846153846 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1538461538 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121728715565 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387248940234 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0279058261536 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0725049217661 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0069937248675 0.056905535591 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.