In contemporary times modern technological devices have been changed the pattern of relationships not only in society but also between family members. Nowadays, we can see that the presence of our fingerprints is always on handheld devices, as a consequence of the strength of bonding between people are diminishing gradually. But it is not true for all cases it makes easy the way of communication, however, distance does not matter today. Nevertheless, I completely agree with the statement. In the following paragraphs, I will give arguments on behalf of my willingness.
On the one hand, due to the accessibility of modern gadgets, the young generation is more addicted to different electronic devices. Therefore, they are willing to spend more time in front of the screen without family, as a result, the intimacy among the family members is not well. For example, recent research showed that in the UK 70 % of young pupils play games on the computer or mobile when they get time after studies without being spent with their parents. The sociologists mentioned it as a great threat to human beings.
On the other hand, today most people all around the world are more active on different social online portals. They like to share their emotions and expect motivation from the people without being expressed to their dearest ones. Therefore, a distance is created between the family members. For instance, in the European countries in marriage breakdown is increasing day by day, whereas lack of communication and loneliness are the main reasons claimed by the sociologist.
In conclusion, it can not be denied by anyone that technology has changed the mood of communication sometimes it is counted as a blessing. To sum up all the points above it is clear that, though it makes our life easier in terms of our social life it creates a gap between people.
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine Government funding should reflect this To what extend do you agree 84
- Some people believe that hosting international sports events is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both these views and state your opinion 84
- The table below shows the production of cacao beans in six regions between 1992 and 1998 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- The bar chart below shows the sector contributions to India s gross domestic product from 1960 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 86
- The chart below shows how much money is spent in the budget on different sectors by the UAE government in 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02258064516 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90673818396 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596774193548 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7906954025 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.8 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0666666667 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163741111436 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483246049559 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398603194617 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892631571543 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379614817038 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.