The chart below shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart makes a comparison of the average regular higher and lower level of two particular objects which caused air pollution in four megacities in 2000.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that Mexico City was in the top place for carrying the highest amount of both pollutant particles, while Los Angeles was in the least except N20.
To begin with Los Angeles and Mexico, the latter city had the highest level of min SO2 than all other cities which was 80, whereas the former had the level 2. The same trend for max SO2 in the case of Los Angeles, it was one-twentieth of Mexico City. The level of max N2O was 207 in the case of Mexico, on the other hand, Los Angeles had half of its level and in the case of min N20, it’s one-third of Mexico.
Turning to the other two cities, in Calcutta the level of both max and min SO2 was 47 and 59 respectively, while Beijing had half in case of min SO2 but more than twice in case of max. The level of min N2O was doubled than Beijing, while in the case of maximization both were almost similar levels.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-31 | Sanaullah97 | 56 | view |
| 2021-07-31 | Sanaullah97 | 61 | view |
- The bar charts below show the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in different schools in four different countries in 2001 78
- Some people believe that bicycles are the best mode of transport in the cities while others disagree Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both views and give your opinion 84
- The table below shows the expenses per week of a retired single person and a couple in Australia for their comfortable lifestyle Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 78
- Some companies spend a lot of money on scientific research and use animals for testing Many argue that this is for a just cause while others say otherwise Do the advantages of using animals in research outweigh its disadvantages 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, third, whereas, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.32673267327 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18639329841 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50495049505 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.1527078957 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.857142857 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8571428571 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 5.23603664747 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126319551674 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754527473037 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0949674680994 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109956715755 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110824616986 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.43 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.