What causes global warming? The only way to deal with is from governments not individuals. What are your opinion?
The trap of Carbon Dioxide into the atmosphere creates the curtain which blocks the heat of the sunlight or other pollutants from getting out of space. This process eventuates in the global temperature increasing as known as global warming. The problem brings some debates that the solution for protecting the environment comes from the government or individuals. In my view, each person is a crucial key to determining the settlement on global warming inasmuch as the power of many a little makes a mickle.
To begin with, the interaction of each person is more attractive and more forceful than the government since people have a tendency to collect and follow the information through the Internet. Hence, if the problem of global warming was raised into a high concern from each group of individuals such as the environmental company, the influencer, it will draw the attention of people to contribute a hand to solve these problems efficiently. For example, well-known people on the Internet can post pictures or information regarding natural problems and call for help, which will probably make a difference. Furthermore, the government not only takes care of the multitudes of fields to run the country, but also deals with the economic fluctuation. Therefore, each person has to be aware of this result in a strong shield which pushes away the pollution.
Moreover, residents are factors that interact with the factual circumstance which means that they are the people solving this problem. Most types of pollution are caused by individuals; therefore, they have to solve the aforementioned problem instead of the government interfering. Taking my street as a compelling example to clear this. In the past, there were many people who wasted trash in this place, leading to air pollution. In order to constrain it, my neighborhood endeavors to dilute the harmful effects of pollution by creating a poster pinned on the street. As a result, the wasting was decreased and the fresh air started to appear, which made my street more immaculate.
In the end, individuality is a fundamental key for environmental problems that could restrict the growth of global warming.
- In advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize their products are new in some ways Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 92
- In the past shopping was a routine domestic task Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby To what extent do you think this is a positive trend 93
- The diagrams show changes in a student common room 73
- The use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries and shops To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- THE MAP BELOW SHOW THE CHANGES THAT TOOK PLACE IN THE TOWN AT THE SEASIDE RESORT OF BEACH BETWEEN 1950 AND 1990 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, such as, as a result, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1830.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18413597734 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94117575305 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563739376771 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6247708938 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.375 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0625 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.45110844103 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152517211149 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479083899851 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456938090815 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940423983156 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382206634554 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.