The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003-2013.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the mail features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares the proportion of American who had meals in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
Overall, most people in USA chose eating at fast food eateries once a week in 2003 and 2006; and they went to fast food restaurants once or twice a month in 2013. Additionally, the number of people choosing to eat fast food for daily meals accounted for the lowest percentages in all three years.
In 2003 and 2006, more than one third of American ate at fast food eateries once a week, but on 2013, the number decreased to about 27%. The rate of people in USA consuming fast food at restaurants once or twice a month went down 5% in the first three years, and soaring to around 33% in 2013.
The percentages of people who chose fast food for their meal as several times a week fluctuated around 16% to 20%, and these figures were slightly higher than these figures of people ate fast food a few time a year. The proportion of daily eaters and those who had never eat fast food accounted for a very small percentages in all three years with about 5%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-12 | Nowshin Tabassum | 56 | view |
- Nowadays many families have both parents working Some working parents believe other family members like grandparents can take care of their children while others think childcare centers provide the best care Discuss both view and give your own opinion 56
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 56
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 73
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 35, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to eat'.
Suggestion: to eat
...013. Overall, most people in USA chose eating at fast food eateries once a week in 20...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 37, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to fast'
Suggestion: to fast
...3. The percentages of people who chose fast food for their meal as several times a ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 200, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'few times'.
Suggestion: few times
...these figures of people ate fast food a few time a year. The proportion of daily eaters ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 216, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...people ate fast food a few time a year. The proportion of daily eaters and those wh...
^^^
Line 4, column 271, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'eaten'.
Suggestion: eaten
...of daily eaters and those who had never eat fast food accounted for a very small pe...
^^^
Line 4, column 312, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'percentage'?
Suggestion: percentage
...at fast food accounted for a very small percentages in all three years with about 5%.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41624365482 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31161292828 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477157360406 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.4483503792 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.285714286 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1428571429 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248952328441 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142377054372 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636317090937 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187287847605 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441043652616 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.71 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.