Two charts below show the percentage of qualified graduates in particular countries. summarise in the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The information about educated people who had been done their degrees by different fields in specific nation in 1980 and 2008 it’s illustrated in pie chart.
In an overview, maximum students had been done by Master science in both years,however, PHD arts less demandable
After having a glimpse it can be clearly seen that 25% people qualified with first-degree arts in 1980,whilst they decreased in second time period which was 11%. Furthermore, there was negligible difference between 1980 and 2008 for getting master arts by learner that was 12% in former year and 13% in later year. In addition, only 2% degree holders qualified in 1980 but it inclined in 2008 with 5%.
Probingfurther, near about one fifth students had graduated through first degree science, alternatively, This trend dropped till 10% in later year. Moreover, students showed to stable demand on Master Science in both period it was 29%. Finally, maximum degree holders achieved their degree with 29% in 1980 and 30% in 2008 atparticular country
- The diagram below shows the production of olive oil
- Two charts below show the percentage of qualified graduates in particular countries 11
- The maps show the changes of an office building between the present and the future 78
- Some people believe that technology has made man more social To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in european country between 1987 and 2007 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 79, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , however
...een done by Master science in both years,however, PHD arts less demandable After having...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1686746988 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77150337324 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650602409639 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.249142597 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.571428571 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 5.23603664747 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0538971001484 0.215688989381 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0296658046211 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0163969514245 0.0843802449381 19% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0332912727017 0.15604864568 21% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219930929932 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.