The table below illustrates weekly consumption by age group of dairy products in a European country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The table represents the consumption of dairy products of four age rackets in a European country over a course of a week.
Apparently, the youngest groups consume the least regarding milk and butter amount despite possessing the highest fat content. The 65+ people drink the most milk, mainly low fat meanwhile the 45-65 subgroup eat more butter than the other three with an equivalence between full and low fat consumers.
Obviously, as age ascends, the amount of milk increased: 1200 for under 25 brackets, 1650, 1670 and 1900 respectively for 26-45; 45-65 and 65+ agglomeration. On the contrary, the fat content is lower for the older at 20 for 26-24; 45 for 45-65 and 30 for over 65 people.
In terms of butter, younger people also use the least at merely 12g, in contrast to 19g for those 26-45, and 60g and 30g for the two older groups in turn. Drawing a parallel of full fat shoppers, we can see no discrepancy with the first place pertinent to under 25 group(60%), followed by 45-65 counterpart (50%), the 65+ ranked third with 49%, and the 25-45’s proportion is only 38%.
- the three pictures show different type of bride summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant 56
- Shopping habits depend more on your age group than anything else To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people focus on news in their own country while others think it is more important to be aware of international news Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- The picture below shows the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, regarding, so, third, while, in contrast, in contrast to, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.48453608247 27% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.03092783505 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 32.9175257732 6% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 26.3917525773 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 937.175257732 96% => OK
No of words: 189.0 206.0 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75661375661 4.54256449028 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.78020617076 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5862897146 2.54303337028 102% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 127.690721649 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634920634921 0.622605031667 102% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 290.88556701 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.41237113402 85% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 16.3608247423 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.42492979 44.8134815571 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.428571429 76.5299724578 168% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 16.8248392259 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.7142857143 4.34317383033 339% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 7.41237113402 13% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0773416183251 0.216113520407 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600386241438 0.0766984524023 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10912193305 0.0603063233224 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.095487207619 0.12726935374 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133327533153 0.0580467560999 230% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 8.37731958763 173% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 77.91 70.7449484536 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 8.71597938144 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 7.59969072165 112% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 41.2886597938 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 8.54432989691 150% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.