The chart illustrates distances traveled per person per week (in kilometers) in terms of 5 types of transport in the UK between 1990 and 2000.
The bar chart manifests the average kilometers that an individual commuted in a course of a week in UK over the period from 1990 to 2000. From an overall perspective, it is sufficiently apparent that increase in rail, bus and air had followed by a humble rise in total length notwithstanding a marginal decrease in bicycle and motorbike.
Concerning two leaders, which were public transportation and train, in 1990 there were precisely 40-kilimeter weekly travel on communal vehicle. On the start of successive decades, that number rose to 42%. Train, on the other hand, though it was always transcended by their counterpart, was recorded at 36 and 38 respectively.
Nonetheless, none of the three left transportations were used to travel for more than 5 kilometers per week. In 1990, people only flied for 1 kilometer, prior to approximately 4 in 2000. In contrast, inhabitants went by bike and motorbike for 4 and 5 each, preceding a tiny dive to 1 and 2.
Overall, total reported was exactly 100 in 1990, and a subsequent 110, or thereabouts at the end of the period surveyed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-16 | MinhMinh122 | view | |
| 2023-07-16 | MinhMinh122 | view | |
| 2023-06-10 | baguette | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-10 | baguette | view | |
| 2023-06-01 | baguette | 78 | view |
- Students perform better in school when they are rewared rather than punished To what extent do you agree Discuss both view and give your own opinion 90
- Movies and computer games containing violence are popular Some people say they have a negative effect on society and should be censored Others say they are just harmless relaxation Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 92
- The bar chart below shows the average duration of housework women did unemployed part time employed and full time when compared to men who had full time work in the UK between 1985 and 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fea 61
- The process diagram details the steps by which pineapples are produced for sales Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the key features and make comparison where relevant 78
- Students perform better in school when they are rewared rather than punished To what extent do you agree Discuss both view and give your own opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nonetheless, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95081967213 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20057215166 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661202185792 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9648960664 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.666666667 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221425080221 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077534408341 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903926309809 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10647851062 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576185802537 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.