It is undeniable that settling in addition to the person have to communicate by a foreign language day by day may lead to a variety of social issues in terms of practical ones. I believe that living in an overseas country has many drawbacks but it also have some positive impacts on individuals.
When a person need to use foreign language usually, he or she can get lots of merits. First of all, they may maintain their pronunciation as well as vocabulary to speak more fluently. That is also the reason why the ones who are keen on learning a new language will tend to study or settle in that country. It is not only help them save money but also is a feasible way to become a bilingual or trilingual. Secondly, individuals can make friends who are local residents and learn about their culture and attitudes. Hence, it helps expand their horizons. Besides, building a good relationships with foreign friends also has political meanings as it strengthens the relationship between 2 countries.
However, living in a foreign country also has many negative effects on individuals. Firstly, You can make them become less confident due to the fact that the language is not their mother tongue and it is really hard to speak fluently as locals. Therefore, Many people will feel shy when they talk to native residents and lead to the lack of social relationships. Moreover, in many countries, there is still a severe discrimination. For instance, as being an Asean. if the person travels or settles in Europe, he or she might be discriminated because of their color skin or nationality. Thus, those individuals will find it hard to claim carers allowance as the local people despise even do not recognize their efforts and contributions.
In conclusion, while settling in a foreign country may cause a number of benefits such as improving language skills and making new friends, there are still some detrimental effects on people’s confidence and their future chances.
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems 89
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es in terms of practical ones. I believe that living in an overseas country has m...
^^
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
... country has many drawbacks but it also have some positive impacts on individuals. ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 579, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'relationship'?
Suggestion: relationship
...heir horizons. Besides, building a good relationships with foreign friends also has political...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...ation. For instance, as being an Asean. if the person travels or settles in Europe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91291291291 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87962779195 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561561561562 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8331876507 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2352941176 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5882352941 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8823529412 7.06120827912 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201814934278 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553820127813 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542475669046 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126819395602 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386631158213 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.