The charts give information about two genres of TV programmes watched by men and women and four different age groups in Australia. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevent.
The bar graphs illustrate about the proportion of citizenry nin Australia which includes men, women and other four age groups who watched couple of geners programmes on TV.
To begin with, by analysing the first bar graph of reality shows, it is clear that the proportion of female (70%) is the twice of male (35%). Furthermore, the proportion of teenagers is half (50%) of the total (100%) who watches that shows. Apart from that, 25-34 age group have 60% proportional in this criteria. However, 35-44 and 45+ age masses have similar proportion with the difference of only 1%.
On contrast, by examine second graph which reveals the proportion of game shows that, male and female has similar count of percentage with little difference of 1%. However, 45+ age group have higher proportion (70%) in comparison to others. Whereas, 25-34 and 35-44 age group is on similar count (39% and 41%). Apart from that, teenage group is once more half of the total proportion respectively.
Overall, every age group shows differentiate in proportion, on contrary the percentage of teenage group become same in both generes of TV programme which is seen by Australian residents.
- Nowadays more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face Is this a positive or negative development 56
- Some people think it is a waste of time for high school students to study literature such as novels and poems To what extend do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people believe that hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Fast food is becoming one part of life everywhere this has bad effects on our lifestyle and diet To what extent do you agree or disagree 69
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious problems as well as practical problems To what extend do u agree or disagree with the statement 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 292, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...5-34 age group have 60% proportional in this criteria. However, 35-44 and 45+ age ma...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, whereas, apart from, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9896373057 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67561275126 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549222797927 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4281015012 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165453760058 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731614050807 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689142229298 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12890320648 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751920825769 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.