Task 1 The charts give information about two genres of TV programs watched by men and women and four different age groups in Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

Task 1:
The charts give information about two genres of TV programs watched by men and women and four different age groups in Australia. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart compares data regarding two distinct TV programs, namely reality shows and game shows, seen by males, females, and four other age groups in Australia. It is quite evident that females prefer watching reality shows more, whereas in case of game shows, both genders’ ratio is almost at par. Additionally, it is also clear that people above 45 years are fonder of game shows than the rest.

In the case of reality shows, the interest of people keeps on gradually increasing with their age, with approximately an increase of 20% from the age group of 16 to 24 years to above 45 years. These shows entertain females the most who mark the highest proportion of almost 70 %, and men have the slightest liking with only about 35% of them who watch these programs.

Consequently, it can be observed that the percentages of both genders are almost identical in the case of game shows. However, games interest youth between 16 to 24 years of age and elder people above 45 years with about 50% views by the former and 70% by the latter. However, the lowest mark in this category is made by age groups 25 to 30, and 35 to 44 with a ratio of nearly 40%.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-08 RIYA MODI 78 view
2021-07-30 Komaldeep 100 view
2021-07-29 Komaldeep 73 view
2019-08-27 madi82 72 view
Essays by user RIYA MODI :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, regarding, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57211538462 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38841783012 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.280975876 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.875 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107737103637 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487686474219 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049568191631 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0767378397613 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205514841847 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.