In many large cities in the world, the quality of life is decreasing. What are the reasons for this? Suggest some possible solutions.
It is thought that living in the big cities has not been a worthy place for the residents as the living standards have been increasingly degraded. There are several factors related to this issue and the measures should be taken to address it.
It is possibly said that declining the quality of life may be caused by two main reasons. The first reason is that unlimited use car of drivers to lead to traffic congestion during rush hours. Toxic fumes or emissions from private vehicles have been releasing carbon dioxide, fine dust or lead into the atmosphere. This could, therefore, be harmed human’s health, people are likely to contract some respiratory diseases including asthma or even lung cancer. The rapid growth of crime rate is the second factor that renders people unsafe when residing in large cities. Take Ho Chi Minh city for this obvious example, wealthy or affluent people are usually the aim of criminals who snatch the bag or use knives or homemade weapons to threaten and then appropriate their property.
To solve this problem, three major solutions should be identified to tackle problems. Firstly, the government should invest more national budget in expanding roads or refurbishing public transport system. If these measures succeeded changing the frequent car use of people, it could ease the high volume of traffic jam in the near future. Secondly, increasing the number of policemen and CCTV installations on the streets, which will be guaranteed more residential safety. Lastly, the awareness of dwellers should be gradually raised through television channels to demonstrate for viewers how to protect themselves when coping with criminals as well as change the way of using private vehicles.
In conclusion, although residents in big cities are facing with both environmental and safe problems, the authorities will be implementing some potential measures to deal with the issue. Hence, the quality of people will be improved greatly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-01 | thanhlan0201 | 89 | view |
- Some people could be naturally good leaders Others believe that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Governments should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion Others support building more and wider roads Discuss both of these viewpoints and give your opinion 89
- Online shopping is becoming more popular How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of work required 73
- It is neither possible nor useful to provide university places for a high proportion of young people To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others believe it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24683544304 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67964548399 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655063291139 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9320474593 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.533333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153979028376 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456194202269 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368992471618 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0859578328015 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404585431697 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24683544304 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67964548399 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655063291139 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9320474593 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.533333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153979028376 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456194202269 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368992471618 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0859578328015 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404585431697 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.