the chart below shows male and female fitness membership in Thailand between 1985 and 2015
The given bar chart demonstrates how many men and women joined in a fitness club measured in Thailand from 1985 to 2015.
Overall, although there were considerable fluctuations, the number of females tended to increase, meanwhile that of males decreased after a period of 30 years. However, the figures for both male and female participants reached the peak in 2010.
In 1985, it was noticeable that the quantity of male members in Thailand outnumbered that of females (2200 and 1300 people, respectively). Between 1985 and 1990, the proportions of gentlemen and ladies hitting a gym were an upward trend to 3800 and 1900 respectively and the numbers of males was at least twice as high as that for females. In the next 10 years, males going to a gym showed a considerable drop to 1800, while females were a slow decline in 1995, in contrast ,female members rose sharply and reached at 2800 in 2000.
Between 2000 and 2010, males taking part in the fitness club had a constant growth and reached the highest point at 5000 participants in 2010. Interestingly, there was a similar pattern of women from 1990 to 2000, especially, this amount peaked at 2950 members in 2010. In the last 5 years, the rates of all men and women witnessed a dramatic fall. Ladies dropped a third, while gentlemen went down one-fifth in the figure for members in 2010.
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing school and starting university studies Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decided to do it 73
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Write at least 150 words 67
- Television sporting shows such as Olympics to motivate the youth who do not like to exercise much Do you agree or disagree 56
- Influence of human beings on the world s ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio diversity what are the primary cause of loss of bio diversity What solutions can you suggest 84
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 472, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...were a slow decline in 1995, in contrast ,female members rose sharply and reached ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, third, while, at least, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1127.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83690987124 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68165139673 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562231759657 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7290825467 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.7 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265195027986 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979757414169 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778900547238 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161717109364 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074577577123 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.