Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays. Some people say that countries and individuals should protect these animals from dying out, while others say that we should concentrate more on problems human beings. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
We are blessed with the treasure of nature comprising fuel, water, earth, flora and fauna. Presently, animal species are at the low ebb on account of disgraceful activities of human beings. Therefore, some people claim that the prime responsibility of humans is to prevent animals from extinction by offering them safe environment. By contrast, others are more concerned about hardships of human beings. Here, I would like to account for both sides with my own perception.
Numerous points can be put down to shore up the former view. First and foremost, the role of animals to maintain the food c...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-05-04 | halleybachelor | 70 | view |
- Machine translation is slower and less accurate than human translation and there is immediate or predictable likelihood of machines taking over this role for humans. Do you agree or disagree ? 87
- Nowadays young people are spending most of their leisure time using smartphone and tablets for amusement Is it a positive or a negative development Give your opinion 96
- When a country develops its technology ,the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to keep them alive. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion. 70
- There is a growing demand for fresh water nowadays and this is becoming a global problem Discuss the possible causes for it What measures can be taken by governments and individuals to overcome this problems 77
- Space tourism: Will it bring positive or negative effects on the world's development? Give your own opinion. Use example based on your experience. 80
Comments
offering them safe
offering them safe environment
should it be "a safe environment"?
hunters manage their livelihood by killing to predators
should it be "by killing predators"?
contribution in the financial and health prosperity
should it be "contribution to the financial and health prosperity"?
On the contrary, other's views are conflicting
should it be "on the other hand"?
They think that humans are excellent species on the earth than others
should it be "humans are superior species on the earth than others"?
sorry if I get you wrong...
for sake of man's well being
for the sake of man's well being
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 23 15
No. of Words: 373 350
No. of Characters: 1870 1500
No. of Different Words: 229 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.395 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.013 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.719 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 130 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 101 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 65 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 49 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.217 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.116 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.609 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.243 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.473 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.045 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5