Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays. Some people say that countries and individuals should protect these animals from dying out, while others say that we should concentrate more on problems human beings. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
We are blessed with the treasure of nature comprising fuel, water, earth, flora and fauna. Presently, animal species are at the low ebb on account of disgraceful activities of human beings. Therefore, some people claim that the prime responsibility of humans is to prevent animals from extinction by offering them safe environment. By contrast, others are more concerned about hardships of human beings. Here, I would like to account for both sides with my own perception.
Numerous points can be put down to shore up the former view. First and foremost, the role of animals to maintain the food c...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-05-04 | halleybachelor | 70 | view |
- Some people believe that it is impossible to help everyone in need around the world That is why governments should only focus on helping people of their own country To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your own opinion and rele 65
- Some people believe that countries should invite foreign companies to open their brunches, offices and factories in order to develop their economies. Others think countries should invest in their own companies instead. Discuss both views and give your own 85
- Nowadays nations are becoming more interesting and developing better thanks to the mixing of different nationalities and cultures To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The number of working mother has been an the rise lately.some people argue that it is government responsibility to provide free child care to help working mother.Do you agree or disagree with the above statement. 65
- Sport today is turning into a business, with many companies involved and ever growing prize money for the sportsmen. Do you think it’s a positive or negative development? 90
Comments
offering them safe
offering them safe environment
should it be "a safe environment"?
hunters manage their livelihood by killing to predators
should it be "by killing predators"?
contribution in the financial and health prosperity
should it be "contribution to the financial and health prosperity"?
On the contrary, other's views are conflicting
should it be "on the other hand"?
They think that humans are excellent species on the earth than others
should it be "humans are superior species on the earth than others"?
sorry if I get you wrong...
for sake of man's well being
for the sake of man's well being
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 23 15
No. of Words: 373 350
No. of Characters: 1870 1500
No. of Different Words: 229 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.395 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.013 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.719 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 130 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 101 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 65 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 49 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.217 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.116 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.609 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.243 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.473 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.045 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5