The maps give information about a university sports court
The maps depict the modification made to the layout of a sports court of a university.
Overall, the place has witnessed significant changes, prominent of which are several resituations as well as erections of new facilities. However, the reception and the café stayed unchanged over the years.
As per the maps, to the northwestern of the courtyard, trees in the park were rooted up to make way for the basketball court. Additionally, in opposition with the aforementioned court dedicated to basketball playing is the resituated tennis court, the quantity of which has doubled throughout the time period. By virtue of the increase in the number of tennis facilities, the car park was demolished.
Moreover, the area adjacent to it has now been encased in a block; as a result, the pool has now become an indoor one. There has also been a relocation of the changing room, from aligning itself with the reception to facing the mentioned pool. In addition, a fitness centre has been built in replacement of the initial tennis courts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-05 | thuphuong2302 | view | |
| 2022-03-05 | thuphuong2302 | view |
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Average percentages of sodium saturated fats and added sugars in typical meals consumed in the USA Average percentag 84
- The maps below compare 2 floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010 78
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012 89
- The 2 maps below show the changes that have taken place in Felixstone from 1967 to 2001 Summarise the best relevant points and make comparisons where relevant 78
- What are the pros and cons of using public transport 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 335, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...placement of the initial tennis courts.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, well, in addition, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03468208092 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97157055242 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612716763006 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5477806416 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7777777778 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110421365179 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0448238934731 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804180434147 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.084887379706 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103375727276 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.