Course selection is necessary for each undergraduate student. Some students prefer to choose a course with a popular professor lecturing, while others tend to select a class lectured by professors who are rewarded for outstanding research. As for me, I think selecting a class with a professor who possesses outstanding research rewards is better.
First of all, I can get wider knowledge in the class lectured by professors who have outstanding research rewards. For example, when I studied biochemistry courses in my sophomore, the professor, who had won Nobel chemistry prizes, told me a lot of biosynthesis knowledge, such as ATP production and bio cycling synthesis. With this knowledge, I know 20 kinds of biochemical principles and even some avant-garde concepts. Furthermore, I used the knowledge I learned from that class to participate in academic competition and won the first prize. Hence, enrolling in a class lectured by a professor who has outstanding research rewards really expands my knowledge.
Secondly, attending the class lectured by the professor with extraordinary research rewards can allow me to solve academic problems effectively. For instance, when I attended a math class, my professor, who had a high reputation in the mathematics field, helped me to solve advanced calculus problems. In order to participate in the college Math contest, I got a lot of hints on each difficult math problem from the professor, allowing me to solve the math problems quickly and correctly. Finally, I only spent 30 minutes solving the questions and won the golden medal with ease. Thus, the class lectured by the professor with extraordinary research reward made me solve academic problems effectively.
Last but not least, I can learn a positive attitude from professors who are rewarded for outstanding research if I participate in his or her class. Take myself for example; when I joined a polymer science experiment class, Professor Tung always encouraged students to keep trying. He told us that he failed each experiment at first. After keeping trying, he finally got a significant breakthrough in new polymer discovery and got the college award. Due to this encouragement, I have never given up on each of my failures. I always kept positive thinking to face any challenge in my life. Therefore, Professor Tung’s story really inspired me and encouraged me to be optimistic.
In conclusion, I hold the profound conviction that it is better for me to take the course taught by a professor who possesses outstanding research rewards. After all, I can gain wider knowledge, solve problems effectively, and learn a positive attitude on this kind of course.
- Which of the following can benefit students more Online classes or traditional classes 76
- Agree or disagree students are more interested in politics than they were in the past 91
- Agree or disagree students are more interested in politics than they were in the past 73
- Students of a university have a long break between university semesters the university requires all students to do one of the following for one month during the break 1 Students must take a course on the subject that has no direct connection to their ma 76
- Some people believe that it is important to follow traditions even if they conflict with their beliefs other believe individual preferences are important than traditions 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun biosynthesis seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of biosyntheses'.
Suggestion: a lot of biosyntheses
...had won Nobel chemistry prizes, told me a lot of biosynthesis knowledge, such as ATP production and b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, after all, as for, even so, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, kind of, of course, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2258.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2511627907 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11155490581 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488372093023 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 696.6 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0256116353 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.636363636 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5454545455 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.95454545455 5.45110844103 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350800387994 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118678142928 0.076458572812 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115184466982 0.0737576698707 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232175145504 0.150856017488 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102463494986 0.0645574589148 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.